ArticleEcology and evolution2020
There's a storm a-coming: Ecological resilience and resistance to extreme weather events.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Widespread ecological responses and cascading effects of the 2021 western North American heatwave.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis reveals less sensitivity of non-native animals than natives to extreme weather worldwide.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Pooled it
- Persistent effects of experimental heatwave duration on population dynamics.Biology letters · 2026Article
- How wildlife respond to tropical cyclones: short-term tactics and long-term impacts.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Extreme weather effects on marine predator breeding outcomes in a global climate change hotspot.Science advances · 2026Article
- Trends and weather events in long-term densities of an insular lizard.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Understanding Trophic Interactions in a Warming World by Bridging Foraging Ecology and Biomechanics with Network Science.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024Article
- Non-native species resist extreme events.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- A conceptual framework for assessing behavioral flexibility of species in response to extreme climatic events.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Chill coma recovery of Ceratitis capitata adults across the Northern Hemisphere.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Flowering time runs hot and cold.Plant physiology · 2022Review
- Bird rookery nutrient over-enrichment as a potential accelerant of mangrove cay decline in Belize.Oecologia · 2021Article
- There's a storm a-coming: Ecological resilience and resistance to extreme weather events.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme weather events (EWEs) are expected to increase in stochasticity, frequency, and intensity due to climate change. Documented effects of EWEs, such as droughts, hurricanes, and temperature extremes, range from shifting community stable states to species extirpations. To date, little attention has been paid to how populations resist and/or recover from EWEs through compensatory (behavioral, demographic, or physiological) mechanisms; limiting the capacity to predict species responses to future changes in EWEs. Here, we systematically reviewed the global variation in species' demographic responses, resistance to, and recovery from EWEs across weather types, species, and biogeographic regions. Through a literature review and meta-analysis, we tested the prediction that population abundance and probability of persistence will decrease in populations after an EWE and how compensation affects that probability. Across 524 species population responses to EWEs reviewed (27 articles), we noted large variation in responses, such that, on average, the effect of EWEs on population demographics was not negative as predicted. The majority of species populations (80.4%) demonstrated compensatory mechanisms during events to reduce their deleterious effects. However, for populations that were negatively impacted, the demographic consequences were severe. Nearly 20% of the populations monitored experienced declines of over 50% after an EWE, and 6.8% of populations were extirpated. Population declines were reflected in a reduction in survival. Further, resilience was not common, as 80.0% of populations that declined did not recover to before EWE levels while monitored. However, average monitoring time was only two years with over a quarter of studies tracking recovery for less than the study species generation time. We conclude that EWEs have positive and negative impacts on species demography, and this varies by taxa. Species population recovery over short-time intervals is rare, but long-term studies are required to accurately assess species resilience to current and future events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.