Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209277›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

There's a storm a-coming: Ecological resilience and resistance to extreme weather events.

Eric W Neilson, Clayton T Lamb, Sean M Konkolics, Michael J L Peers, Yasmine N Majchrzak, Darcy Doran-Myers, Laura Garland, April Robin Martinig, Stan Boutin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. How wildlife respond to tropical cyclones: short-term tactics and long-term impacts.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Non-native species resist extreme events.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Flowering time runs hot and cold.Plant physiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric W NeilsonBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-485X
Clayton T LambBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Sean M KonkolicsBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Michael J L PeersBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-2056
Yasmine N MajchrzakBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Darcy Doran-MyersBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Laura GarlandBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
April Robin MartinigBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-6903
Stan BoutinBiological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-038X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme weather events (EWEs) are expected to increase in stochasticity, frequency, and intensity due to climate change. Documented effects of EWEs, such as droughts, hurricanes, and temperature extremes, range from shifting community stable states to species extirpations. To date, little attention has been paid to how populations resist and/or recover from EWEs through compensatory (behavioral, demographic, or physiological) mechanisms; limiting the capacity to predict species responses to future changes in EWEs. Here, we systematically reviewed the global variation in species' demographic responses, resistance to, and recovery from EWEs across weather types, species, and biogeographic regions. Through a literature review and meta-analysis, we tested the prediction that population abundance and probability of persistence will decrease in populations after an EWE and how compensation affects that probability. Across 524 species population responses to EWEs reviewed (27 articles), we noted large variation in responses, such that, on average, the effect of EWEs on population demographics was not negative as predicted. The majority of species populations (80.4%) demonstrated compensatory mechanisms during events to reduce their deleterious effects. However, for populations that were negatively impacted, the demographic consequences were severe. Nearly 20% of the populations monitored experienced declines of over 50% after an EWE, and 6.8% of populations were extirpated. Population declines were reflected in a reduction in survival. Further, resilience was not common, as 80.0% of populations that declined did not recover to before EWE levels while monitored. However, average monitoring time was only two years with over a quarter of studies tracking recovery for less than the study species generation time. We conclude that EWEs have positive and negative impacts on species demography, and this varies by taxa. Species population recovery over short-time intervals is rare, but long-term studies are required to accurately assess species resilience to current and future events.

Indexed as

climate changedisturbanceextreme weather eventsresilienceresistance

Identifiers

PMID33209277
PMCPMC7664005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.