ReviewEcology and evolution2020
What do you mean "functional" in ecology? Patterns versus processes.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which, when, and where traits matter: functional trait-mediated species associations shift with microenvironmental and climatic variation.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Effect of Environmental Drivers on Functional Traits of Salvadora Population in the Semi-Arid Regions: A Case Study From Division Sahiwal Pakistan.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Nutrient connectivity via seabirds enhances dynamic measures of coral reef ecosystem function.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Plastic Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Towards Greater Standardisation in Benthic Trait Research to Support Application to Environmental Management.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
- Spatial patterns of congruence or mismatch between taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity and endemism of perennial flora along the aridity gradient of Chile.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Low internal air space in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism may be an anatomical spandrel.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Aridity drives clinal patterns in leaf traits and responsiveness to precipitation in a broadly distributed Australian tree species.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Is a seasonally reduced growth potential a convergent strategy to survive drought and frost in plants?Annals of botany · 2023Review
- Pollen-based reconstruction reveals the impact of the onset of agriculture on plant functional trait composition.Ecology letters · 2022Article
- Inferring microbiota functions from taxonomic genes: a review.GigaScience · 2022Review
- Testing for functional significance of traits: Effect of the light environment in tropical tree saplings.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- What do you mean "functional" in ecology? Patterns versus processes.Ecology and evolution · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of the term "functional" trait has increased exponentially in ecology. Although accounting for numerous ecological questions, this concept raises several issues. We propose that the term "functional" could be misleading because (1) no rigorous criteria exist to identify "functional" traits and (2) it suggests that only some traits ("functional" ones) can inform our understanding of species functioning, whatever the scale or discipline. Hence, the concept of "functional" trait in ecology is starting to be challenged and it remains unclear why some traits should be considered functional, whereas other traits should not. We argue that the most used "functional" traits are meaningful because they reflect important differences between populations or species, based on synchronic comparisons, that is, irrespective of time (hereafter "pattern" traits). Hence, they are useful for identifying trade-offs and strategies across large numbers of observations, usually at rather coarse scales, and are most often used in analyses of "big data." However, given that many ecological processes occur across short time scales and narrow gradients of climate and resource availability, the efficacy of these traits to inform us about these ecological processes appears questionable. We show that trait measurements that take time explicitly into account (hereafter "process" traits) differ from pattern traits because they quantify the flows of material and energy within a given environment across a defined period of time. Although pattern traits and process traits are both functional, it is important to understand the differences between the approaches. Moreover, better accounting of ontogeny, life form, plasticity, and genetic variability is required to enhance the convergence between pattern and process approaches. This revised framework allows more explicit connections between trait ecology and other biological sciences. It should enhance the study of processes at all scales in order to investigate efficiently the adaptive responses of biological organisms to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.