ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Experimental determination and data-driven prediction of homotypic transmembrane domain interfaces.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transmembrane Homodimers Interface Identification: Predicting Interface Residues in Alpha-Helical Transmembrane Protein Homodimers Using Sequential and Structural Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Mechanosensitive aquaporins.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Antibodies to variable surface antigens induce antigenic variation in the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Small Residues Inhibit Homo-Dimerization of the Human Carbonic Anhydrase XII Transmembrane Domain.Membranes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between their transmembrane domains (TMDs) frequently support the assembly of single-pass membrane proteins to non-covalent complexes. Yet, the TMD-TMD interactome remains largely uncharted. With a view to predicting homotypic TMD-TMD interfaces from primary structure, we performed a systematic analysis of their physical and evolutionary properties. To this end, we generated a dataset of 50 self-interacting TMDs. This dataset contains interfaces of nine TMDs from bitopic human proteins (Ire1, Armcx6, Tie1, ATP1B1, PTPRO, PTPRU, PTPRG, DDR1, and Siglec7) that were experimentally identified here and combined with literature data. We show that interfacial residues of these homotypic TMD-TMD interfaces tend to be more conserved, coevolved and polar than non-interfacial residues. Further, we suggest for the first time that interface positions are deficient in β-branched residues, and likely to be located deep in the hydrophobic core of the membrane. Overrepresentation of the GxxxG motif at interfaces is strong, but that of (small)xxx(small) motifs is weak. The multiplicity of these features and the individual character of TMD-TMD interfaces, as uncovered here, prompted us to train a machine learning algorithm. The resulting prediction method, THOIPA (www.thoipa.org), excels in the prediction of key interface residues from evolutionary sequence data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.