Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209207›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Benchmarking algorithms for pathway activity transformation of single-cell RNA-seq data.

Yaru Zhang, Yunlong Ma, Yukuan Huang, Yan Zhang, Qi Jiang, Meng Zhou, Jianzhong Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spatial Transcriptomic Analyses of Spermatogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaru ZhangInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Yunlong MaInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Yukuan HuangInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Yan ZhangInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Qi JiangInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Meng ZhouInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Jianzhong SuInstitute of Biomedical Big Data, School of Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological pathway analysis provides new insights for cell clustering and functional annotation from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Many pathway analysis algorithms have been developed to transform gene-level scRNA-seq data into functional gene sets representing pathways or biological processes. Here, we collected seven widely-used pathway activity transformation algorithms and 32 available datasets based on 16 scRNA-seq techniques. We proposed a comprehensive framework to evaluate their accuracy, stability and scalability. The assessment of scRNA-seq preprocessing showed that cell filtering had the less impact on scRNA-seq pathway analysis, while data normalization of sctransform and scran had a consistent well impact across all tools. We found that Pagoda2 yielded the best overall performance with the highest accuracy, scalability, and stability. Meanwhile, the tool PLAGE exhibited the highest stability, as well as moderate accuracy and scalability.

Indexed as

BenchmarkGene expressionPathway analysisscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33209207
PMCPMC7642725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.