Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209113›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2020

Recurrent cervical cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy: real-world outcome.

Sharada Mailankody, Manikandan Dhanushkodi, Trivadi S Ganesan, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Vasanth Christopher, Selvaluxmy Ganesharajah, Tenali Gnana Sagar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharada MailankodyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Manikandan DhanushkodiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Trivadi S GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Venkatraman RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Vasanth ChristopherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Selvaluxmy GanesharajahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Tenali Gnana SagarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai 600020, India.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer is the third most common cancer in India. There is limited data on the treatment of relapsed cervical cancer from India; therefore, we report the outcomes of patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were treated with palliative chemotherapy (CT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with recurrent cervical cancer who received palliative CT from January 2012 to December 2016. The demographic details, clinical profile and survival outcomes were collected. Patients were treated with carboplatin or paclitaxel and carboplatin. Local radiation was given for symptomatic patients. Patients were assessed for responses clinically and/or radiologically after three and six cycles of CT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsForty-six patients with recurrent cervical cancer were included in this analysis, with a median follow-up of 9.4 months. The median age was 49.5 (25-65) years and the median disease-free interval was 31.3 (2-196) months. Biopsy confirmation of relapse was established in 63%. The median number of CT cycles was six. Twenty-four (52.2%) patients completed six cycles of CT. The overall response rate was 56.5%. Patients with a complete or a partial response were more likely to have PFS > 6 months (

conclusionPalliative CT with paclitaxel carboplatin is a safe and effective option in Indian patients with recurrent cervical cancer, with more than half of the patients completing the prescribed CT. Further prospective trials may be required to place this treatment in the right context, in this era of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. However, knowing the outcomes in our population and prognostic factors will help in better prognostication of patients, thereby channelling our limited resources where necessary.

Indexed as

chemotherapyoutcomespalliativeprognostic factorsrecurrent cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID33209113
PMCPMC7652539
OpenAlexW3093278138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.