Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209019›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine on Acute Exacerbations of COPD: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Jiansheng Li, Hailong Zhang, Huanrong Ruan, Yimei Si, Zikai Sun, Hong Liu, Jihong Feng, Yanqing Wang, Lihua Li, Li Bai and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Efficacy and Safety of Guizhi Decoction AssociatedFormulas for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jiansheng Li *Co-Construction Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Diseases by Henan & Education Ministry of P.R. China, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hailong Zhang *Co-Construction Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Diseases by Henan & Education Ministry of P.R. China, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Huanrong RuanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yimei SiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zikai SunJiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jihong FengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Yanqing WangHaici Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Lihua LiZhengzhou People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li BaiShanxi Hospital of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.
Hui SunNanyang City Center Hospital, Nanyang, People's Republic of China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNShanxi Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNZhengzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is an essential occurrence in COPD management and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Chinese herbal medicine is widely used in the treatment of AECOPD, but high quality randomized controlled trials are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine as adjuvant therapy for patients with AECOPD. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 378 participants from eight centers in China. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 10 g of Chinese herbal medicine (according to the type of Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome: Sanhanhuayin, Qingrehuatan, or Zaoshihuatan granules) or placebo, two times per day, for 14 days, in addition to conventional medicine. Participants were followed up for 84 days after the treatment. The primary end point was the COPD assessment test (CAT) score. Secondary end points included the Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire and the COPD patient-reported outcome scale (COPD-PRO). We also assessed treatment failure and treatment success rate, length of hospitalization, number of patients with acute exacerbations, number of patients readmitted due to AECOPD, and number of deaths and intubation. Results: The between-group difference in the change from baseline for CAT on day 14 (end of treatment) was -2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.198 to -1.050; P<0.001), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. The mMRC and COPD-PRO scores were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (between-group difference in the change from baseline, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.08; P=0.007 and -2.51; 95% CI, -4.087 to -0.929; P=0.002, respectively) on day 14. The intervention group had a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay than the control group (mean difference, -1.21days; 95% CI, -2.041 to -0.419; P=0.003), significantly lower of number of exacerbations (risk ratio [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.409 to 0.892; P=0.010), and significantly lower number of readmissions due to AECOPD (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.193 to 0.865; P=0.015). Significant differences in the number of treatment failures or successes, deaths, and intubation were not observed. The difference in safety variables and adverse events between the two groups was not observed. Conclusion: Chinese herbal medicine appears to be safe and beneficial for AECOPD and can be considered a complementary treatment for patients with AECOPD.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveChinaDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansMedicine, Chinese TraditionalDrugs, Chinese Herbalacute exacerbationsChinese herbal medicinechronic obstructive pulmonary diseaserandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33209019
PMCPMC7670171
OpenAlexW3103176645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.