ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Enhanced recovery principles applied to revision hip and knee arthroplasty leads to better patient outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Top Three Burning Questions in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Fast-track revision hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort study on 1,345 elective aseptic major component revision hip arthroplasties.Acta orthopaedica · 2022Observational
- Postoperative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty across varying levels of multimodal pain management protocol adherence.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThere is very little published literature on Enhanced Recovery Principles (ERP) used in primary joint replacements applied to revision hip and knee arthroplasty (rTHA, rTKA).
methodsRetrospective series of 268 rTHA and rTKA surgeries from 2010 -2018, treated with ERP, focusing on multimodal pain management, blood management and early functional recovery.
resultsNo patients from the latest cohort required readmission within 6 weeks. Only 20 patients (7.5%) required a blood transfusion. Surgical site local anaesthetic infiltration was associated with lower PCA use in aseptic rTHA and rTKA (p<0.001; p<0.001). Revisions for infection had a longer length of stay (LOS) and increased PCA usage in both rTHA (6.5 vs. 5.2 days) and rTKA (10.1 vs. 5.3 days), similar to our previous study.
conclusionThe application of ERP to revision THA and TKA surgery is safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.