Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208888›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2021

Organoid-based modeling of intestinal development, regeneration, and repair.

Joep Sprangers, Irene C Zaalberg, Madelon M Maurice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joep SprangersCell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Irene C ZaalbergCell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Madelon M MauriceCell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.m.maurice@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6885-5361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal epithelium harbors a remarkable adaptability to undergo injury-induced repair. A key part of the regenerative response is the transient reprogramming of epithelial cells into a fetal-like state, which drives uniform proliferation, tissue remodeling, and subsequent restoration of the homeostatic state. In this review, we discuss how Wnt and YAP signaling pathways control the intestinal repair response and the transitioning of cell states, in comparison with the process of intestinal development. Furthermore, we highlight how organoid-based applications have contributed to the characterization of the mechanistic principles and key players that guide these developmental and regenerative events.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsEpithelial CellsHomeostasisHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesOrganoidsRegenerationWnt Signaling PathwayYAP-Signaling ProteinsYAP-Signaling Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33208888
PMCPMC7852609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.