Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Fluctuations in the detection of the HOM effect.

Dmitry N Makarov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanoscale Waveguide Beam Splitter in Quantum Technologies.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dmitry N MakarovNorthern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russia. makarovd0608@yandex.ru.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 20-72-10151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect is known to be one of the main phenomena in quantum optics. It is believed that the effect occurs when two identical single-photon waves enter a 1:1 beam splitter, one in each input port. When the photons are identical, they will extinguish each other. In this work, it is shown that these fundamental provisions of the HOM interference may not always be fulfilled. One of the main elements of the HOM interferometer is the beam splitter, which has its own coefficients of reflection [Formula: see text] and transmission [Formula: see text]. Here we consider the general mechanism of the interaction of two photons in a beam splitter, which shows that in the HOM theory of the effect it is necessary to know (including when planning the experiment) not only [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], but also their root-mean-square fluctuations [Formula: see text], which arise due to the dependence of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on the frequencies where [Formula: see text] are the frequencies of the first and second photons, respectively. Under certain conditions, specifically when the dependence of the fluctuations [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] can be neglected and [Formula: see text] is chosen, the developed theory coincides with previously known results.

Identifiers

PMID33208884
PMCPMC7674476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.