Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

DNN-assisted statistical analysis of a model of local cortical circuits.

Yaoyu Zhang, Lai-Sang Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yaoyu ZhangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Institute of Natural Sciences, MOE-LSC and Qing Yuan Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. zhyy.sjtu@sjtu.edu.cn.
Lai-Sang YoungSchool of Mathematics and School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA. lsy@cims.nyu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neuroscience, computational modeling is an effective way to gain insight into cortical mechanisms, yet the construction and analysis of large-scale network models-not to mention the extraction of underlying principles-are themselves challenging tasks, due to the absence of suitable analytical tools and the prohibitive costs of systematic numerical exploration of high-dimensional parameter spaces. In this paper, we propose a data-driven approach assisted by deep neural networks (DNN). The idea is to first discover certain input-output relations, and then to leverage this information and the superior computation speeds of the well-trained DNN to guide parameter searches and to deduce theoretical understanding. To illustrate this novel approach, we used as a test case a medium-size network of integrate-and-fire neurons intended to model local cortical circuits. With the help of an accurate yet extremely efficient DNN surrogate, we revealed the statistics of model responses, providing a detailed picture of model behavior. The information obtained is both general and of a fundamental nature, with direct application to neuroscience. Our results suggest that the methodology proposed can be scaled up to larger and more complex biological networks when used in conjunction with other techniques of biological modeling.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalLogistic ModelsMammalsNeurons

Identifiers

PMID33208805
PMCPMC7674455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.