Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208624›Full record

ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2021

Assessment of Central Nervous System Lymphoma Based on CXCR4 Expression In Vivo Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MRI.

Angelika M Starzer, Anna S Berghoff, Tatjana Traub-Weidinger, Alexander R Haug, Georg Widhalm, Marcus Hacker, Ivo Rausch, Matthias Preusser, Marius E Mayerhoefer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. [Primary imaging diagnostics of lymphomas].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Advances in PET Imaging of the CXCR4 Receptor: [Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Detecting CXCR4 Expression in Meningioma onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Role of [Cancers · 2022
    Review
  15. CXCR4-Directed PET/CT with [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Article
  16. CXCR4-targeted Imaging in DLBCL: A Prospective Head-to-head Comparison ofIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelika M StarzerFrom the Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I.
Anna S BerghoffFrom the Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I.
Tatjana Traub-WeidingerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
Alexander R HaugDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
Georg WidhalmDepartment of Neurosurgery.
Marcus HackerDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.
Ivo RauschCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias PreusserFrom the Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I.
Marius E Mayerhoefer
Medical University of Vienna · ATMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reportF-FDG PET is limited for assessment of central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) due to physiologic tracer accumulation in the brain. We prospectively evaluated the novel PET tracer Ga-pentixafor, which targets the C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), for lesion visualization and response assessment of CNSL. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeven CNSL patients underwent Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI with contrast enhancement (CE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted sequences. The accuracy of Ga-pentixafor PET for CNSL lesion detection relative to the CE-MRI reference standard was determined. Standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax), PET-based (PTV) and MRI-based (VOLMRI) tumor volumes, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were assessed, and correlation coefficients were calculated. Three SUVmax thresholds (41%, 50%, and 70%) were evaluated for PTV definitions (PTV41%, PTV50%, and PTV70%) and tested against VOLMRI using paired sample t tests.

resultsTwelve Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI examinations (including 5 follow-up scans) of 7 patients were evaluated. Ga-pentixafor PET demonstrated 18 lesions, all of which were confirmed by CE-MRI; there were no false-positive lesions on PET (accuracy, 100%). PTV41% showed the highest concordance with lesion morphology, with no significant difference compared with VOLMRI (mean difference, -0.24 cm; P = 0.45). The correlation between ADCmean and SUVmean41% (r = 0.68) was moderate. Changes in PTV41% on follow-up PET/MRI showed the same trend as VOLMRI changes, including progression of 1 lesion each in patient 1 (+456.0% PTV41% and +350.8% VOLMRI) and patient 3 (+110.4% PTV41% and +85.1% VOLMRI).

conclusionsGa-pentixafor PET may be feasible for assessment and follow-up of CNSL. Future studies need to focus on testing its clinical value to distinguish between glioma and CNSL, and between radiation-induced inflammation and viable residual tumor.

Indexed as

Coordination ComplexesMagnetic Resonance ImagingPeptides, CyclicPositron-Emission TomographyAdultCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, CXCR468Ga-pentixaforCoordination ComplexesCXCR4 protein, humanPeptides, CyclicReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID33208624
PMCPMC8385649
OpenAlexW3099088404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.