ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2021
Preoperative Prediction of Communication Difficulties during Awake Craniotomy in Glioma Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation of 136 Cases at a Single Institution.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Anesthesia for awake craniotomy: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey on Awake Craniotomy in Japan.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2022Article
- Indication and eligibility of glioma patients for awake surgery: A scoping review by a multidisciplinary perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Awake craniotomy for auditory brainstem implant in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: Four case reports.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Level I and II deficits-A clinical survey on international practice of awake craniotomy and definitions of postoperative "major" and "minor" deficits.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Two-step awake craniotomy for diffuse supratentorial gliomas.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2021
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awake craniotomy has been widely performed in patients with glioma in eloquent areas to minimize postoperative brain dysfunction. However, neurological examination in awake craniotomy is sometimes problematic due to communication difficulties during the intraoperative awake period. We evaluated preoperative predictors of these difficulties in awake craniotomy for patients with glioma. In all, 136 patients with glioma who underwent awake craniotomy at our institution between January 2012 and January 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups (appropriately awake group and inappropriately awake group) depending on their state during the intraoperative awake period, and the relationship between communication difficulties in awake craniotomy and both clinical and radiological characteristics were assessed. The appropriately awake group included 110 patients, and the inappropriately awake group included 26 patients. Reasons for inclusion in the inappropriately awake group were insufficient wakefulness in 15 patients, restless state in 6, and intraoperative seizures in 5. In multivariate analysis, the likelihood of being inappropriately awake was inversely correlated with preoperative seizures (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.89; p = 0.033) and positively correlated with left-sided lesions (OR, 7.31; 95% CI, 1.54-34.62; p = 0.012). Both lack of preoperative seizures and left-sided lesions were identified as risk factors for intraoperative difficulties in awake craniotomy for patients with glioma. Understanding these risk factors may lead to more appropriate determination of eligibility for awake craniotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.