Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208553›Full record

Trial reportJCI insight2020

Neoadjuvant pazopanib and molecular analysis of tissue response in renal cell carcinoma.

Christopher G Wood, James E Ferguson, Joel S Parker, Dominic T Moore, Jennifer G Whisenant, Susan J Maygarden, Eric M Wallen, William Y Kim, Mathew I Milowsky, Kathryn E Beckermann and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCI insight, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher G WoodDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
James E FergusonDepartment of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Joel S ParkerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Dominic T MooreLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer G WhisenantDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Susan J MaygardenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Eric M WallenDepartment of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
William Y KimLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Mathew I MilowskyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kathryn E BeckermannDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Nancy B DavisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Scott M HaakeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jose A KaramDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dante S BortoneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, and.
Benjamin G VincentLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Thomas PowlesRoyal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
W Kimryn RathmellLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Enhancing Translational Science via Prospective InvestigationK24CA172355 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RATHMELL, WENDY KIMRYN · 2013 to 2017
$870k
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS K24 CA172355NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDSurgery remains the frontline therapy for patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); however, 20%-40% recur. Angiogenesis inhibitors have improved survival in metastatic patients and may result in responses in the neoadjuvant setting. The impact of these agents on the tumor genetic heterogeneity or the immune milieu is largely unknown. This phase II study was designed to evaluate safety, response, and effect on tumor tissue of neoadjuvant pazopanib.METHODSccRCC patients with localized disease received pazopanib (800 mg daily; median 8 weeks), followed by nephrectomy. Five tumors were examined for mutations by whole exome sequencing from samples collected before therapy and at nephrectomy. These samples underwent RNA sequencing; 17 samples were available for posttreatment assessment.RESULTSTwenty-one patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 8 of 21 (38%). No patients with progressive disease. At 1-year, response-free survival and overall survival was 83% and 89%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 toxicity was hypertension (33%, 7 of 21). Sequencing revealed strong concordance between pre- and posttreatment samples within individual tumors, suggesting tumors harbor stable core profiles. However, a reduction in private mutations followed treatment, suggesting a selective process favoring enrichment of driver mutations.CONCLUSIONNeoadjuvant pazopanib is safe and active in ccRCC. Future genomic analyses may enable the segregation of driver and passenger mutations. Furthermore, tumor infiltrating immune cells persist during therapy, suggesting that pazopanib can be combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors without dampening the immune response.FUNDINGSupport was provided by Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline as part of an investigator-initiated study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndazolesKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisPyrimidinesAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorIndazolespazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamidesCancerClinical TrialsExpression profilingOncologyUrology

Identifiers

PMID33208553
PMCPMC7710285
OpenAlexW3102070310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.