Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208475›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical microbiology2021

Unstimulated Pleural Fluid Interferon Gamma for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal, Ritesh Agarwal, Sahajal Dhooria, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, Valliappan Muthu

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. c-Myc inhibits macrophage antimycobacterial response inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pleural fluid biomarkers: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The tuberculous pleural effusion.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashutosh Nath AggarwalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India aggarwal.ashutosh@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8556-3600
Ritesh AgarwalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2547-7668
Sahajal DhooriaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kuruswamy Thurai PrasadDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Inderpaul Singh SehgalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Valliappan MuthuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unstimulated interferon gamma may be a useful pleural fluid biomarker in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). However, the exact threshold of pleural fluid interferon gamma and its accuracy during routine clinical decision-making is not clear. We assessed the performance of pleural fluid interferon gamma in diagnosing TPE and tried to identify a useful assay threshold. We queried the PubMed and Embase databases for publications indexed until May 2020 that provided both sensitivity and specificity data on unstimulated pleural fluid interferon gamma for diagnosis of TPE. A bivariate random effects model was employed to compute summary estimates for diagnostic accuracy parameters, both overall as well as at threshold ranges of <2, 2 to 5, and >5 IU/ml. We retrieved 2,048 citations, of which 67 publications (7,153 patients) were assessed in our review. The summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 0.95), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97), and 310.72 (95% CI, 185.24 to 521.18), respectively. Increasing interferon gamma thresholds did not translate into any substantial change in diagnostic performance; however, eight studies using thresholds of >5 IU/ml showed poorer diagnostic accuracy estimates than other studies with lower thresholds. None of the prespecified subgroup variables significantly influenced relative diagnostic odds ratios in a multivariate meta-regression model. All publications demonstrated a high risk of bias. Unstimulated pleural fluid interferon gamma level provides excellent accuracy for diagnosing TPE and has the potential of becoming a first-line test for this purpose.

Indexed as

Pleural EffusionTuberculosis, PleuralAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersExudates and TransudatesHumansInterferon-gammaSensitivity and SpecificityAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID33208475
PMCPMC8091832
OpenAlexW3099226534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.