Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208370›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Dendritic and parallel processing of visual threats in the retina control defensive responses.

T Kim, N Shen, J-C Hsiang, K P Johnson, D Kerschensteiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Inhibitory Circuits Can Restore OFF Pathway Responses in Retinal Prostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Atypical Retinal Ganglion Cell Function in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T KimJohn F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8090-4269
N ShenJohn F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J-C HsiangJohn F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5268-9239
K P JohnsonJohn F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
D KerschensteinerJohn F. Hardesty, MD Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. kerschensteinerd@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6794-9056
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC ORGANIZATION AND VISUAL PROCESSING IN INTERNEURON CIRCUITS OF THE RETINAR01EY026978 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Kerschensteiner · 2016 to 2026
$3.8M
Synapse rescue and neuroprotection in the retinaR01EY027411 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Kerschensteiner · 2017 to 2026
$3.4M
Neuronal plasticity in retinal circuit development and diseaseR01EY023341 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KERSCHENSTEINER, DANIEL · 2014 to 2022
$2.8M
Tools and approaches for functional connectomics of dense neuropilsR21EY030623 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KERSCHENSTEINER, DANIEL, MORGAN, JOSHUA L · 2019 to 2020
$432k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023341NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026978NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027411NEI NIH HHS R21 EY030623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approaching predators cast expanding shadows (i.e., looming) that elicit innate defensive responses in most animals. Where looming is first detected and how critical parameters of predatory approaches are extracted are unclear. In mice, we identify a retinal interneuron (the VG3 amacrine cell) that responds robustly to looming, but not to related forms of motion. Looming-sensitive calcium transients are restricted to a specific layer of the VG3 dendrite arbor, which provides glutamatergic input to two ganglion cells (W3 and OFFα). These projection neurons combine shared excitation with dissimilar inhibition to signal approach onset and speed, respectively. Removal of VG3 amacrine cells reduces the excitation of W3 and OFFα ganglion cells and diminishes defensive responses of mice to looming without affecting other visual behaviors. Thus, the dendrites of a retinal interneuron detect visual threats, divergent circuits downstream extract critical threat parameters, and these retinal computations initiate an innate survival behavior.

Identifiers

PMID33208370
PMCPMC7673819
OpenAlexW3103354011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.