Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208265›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2021

Biofilm and cell adhesion strength on dental implant surfaces via the laser spallation technique.

J D Boyd, A J Stromberg, C S Miller, M E Grady

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Biofilm and cell adhesion strength on dental implant surfaces via the laser spallation technique.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D BoydDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
A J StrombergDepartment of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
C S MillerDepartment of Oral Health Practice, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Department of Oral Health Research, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
M E GradyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: m.grady@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Understanding the role of anti-apolipoprotein A-I antibodies in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseP20GM130456 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI M. Ashfaqul Alam · 2020 to 2026
$18.7M
OHPP Oral Health Pilot Program P30GM110788 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI EBERSOLE, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Adhesion Screening of Dental Implant Materials Using Laser-Driven Acoustic WavesR03DE029547 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GRADY, MARTHA · 2020 to 2021
$291k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE029547NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130456NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this study are to quantify the adhesion strength differential between an oral bacterial biofilm and an osteoblast-like cell monolayer to a dental implant-simulant surface and develop a metric that quantifies the biocompatible effect of implant surfaces on bacterial and cell adhesion.

methodsHigh-amplitude short-duration stress waves generated by laser pulse absorption are used to spall bacteria and cells from titanium substrates. By carefully controlling laser fluence and calibration of laser fluence with applied stress, the adhesion difference between Streptococcus mutans biofilms and MG 63 osteoblast-like cell monolayers on smooth and rough titanium substrates is obtained. The ratio of cell adhesion strength to biofilm adhesion strength (i.e., Adhesion Index) is determined as a nondimensionalized parameter for biocompatibility assessment.

resultsAdhesion strength of 143 MPa, with a 95% C.I. (114, 176), is measured for MG 63 cells on smooth titanium and 292 MPa, with a 95% C.I. (267, 306), on roughened titanium. Adhesion strength for S. mutans on smooth titanium is 320 MPa, with a 95% C.I. (304, 333), and remained relatively constant at 332 MPa, with a 95% C.I. (324, 343), on roughened titanium. The calculated Adhesion Index for smooth titanium is 0.451, with a 95% C.I. (0.267, 0.622), which increased to 0.876, with a 95% C.I. (0.780, 0.932), on roughened titanium. SIGNIFICANCE: The laser spallation technique provides a platform to examine the tradeoffs of adhesion modulators on both biofilm and cell adhesion. This tradeoff is characterized by the Adhesion Index, which is proposed to aid biocompatibility screening and could help improve implantation outcomes. The Adhesion Index is implemented to determine surface factors that promote favorable adhesion of cells greater than biofilms. Here, an Adhesion Index ≫ 1 suggests favorable biocompatibility.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsCell AdhesionSurface PropertiesTitaniumDental ImplantsTitaniumAdhesionAdhesion indexBiofilmImplantLaser spallationMG 63Streptococcus mutansSurface roughnessTitaniumWeibull analysis

Identifiers

PMID33208265
PMCPMC7775913
OpenAlexW3103696089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.