Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208186›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Identification of Rickettsia felis DNA in the blood of domestic cats and dogs in the USA.

Md Monirul Hoque, Subarna Barua, Patrick John Kelly, Kelly Chenoweth, Bernhard Kaltenboeck, Chengming Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosis of a RareCase reports in infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Monirul HoqueDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Subarna BaruaDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Patrick John KellyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Island Main Road, West Farm, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
Kelly ChenowethDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Bernhard KaltenboeckDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA.
Chengming WangDepartment of Pathobiology, Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA. wangche@auburn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-8340
Auburn University · USRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine · KN

Funding

USDA-ARS 58-6040-9-017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main vector and reservoir host of Rickettsia felis, an emerging human pathogen causing flea-borne spotted fever, is the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis. While cats have not been found to be infected with the organism, significant percentages of dogs from Australia and Africa are infected, indicating that they may be important mammalian reservoirs. The objective of this study was to determine the presence of R. felis DNA in the blood of domestic dogs and cats in the USA.

methodsThree previously validated PCR assays for R. felis and DNA sequencing were performed on blood samples obtained from clinically ill domestic cats and dogs from 45 states (2008-2020) in the USA. The blood samples had been submitted for the diagnosis of various tick-borne diseases in dogs and feline infectious peritonitis virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, and Bartonella spp. in cats. Phylogenetic comparisons were performed on the gltA nucleotide sequences obtained in the study and those reported for R. felis and R. felis-like organisms.

resultsLow copy numbers of R. felis DNA (around 100 copies/ml whole blood) were found in four cats (4/752, 0.53%) and three dogs (3/777, 0.39%). The very low levels of infection in clinically ill animals is consistent with R. felis being an unlikely cause of disease in naturally infected dogs and cats. The low copy numbers we found emphasize the requirement for very sensitive PCRs in prevalence studies.

conclusionsThe low prevalence of naturally infected PCR-positive cats is further evidence that cats are unlikely to be important reservoirs of R. felis. Similarly, the low prevalence in dogs suggests they are not important reservoirs in the USA. Investigations should continue into the role other mammalian species may be playing in the epidemiology of R. felis infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticCat DiseasesCatsCross-Sectional StudiesCtenocephalidesDNA, BacterialDog DiseasesDogsFlea InfestationsPhylogenyRickettsia felisRickettsia InfectionsSequence Analysis, DNAUnited StatesDNA, BacterialDogDomestic catRickettsia felisUSAWhole blood

Identifiers

PMID33208186
PMCPMC7672164
OpenAlexW3103121385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.