Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33208166›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

Adding team-based financial incentives to the Carrot Rewards physical activity app increases daily step count on a population scale: a 24-week matched case control study.

Emma Pearson, Harry Prapavessis, Christopher Higgins, Robert Petrella, Lauren White, Marc Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Emma PearsonFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada.
Harry PrapavessisFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada.
Christopher HigginsIvey Business School, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Robert PetrellaFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada.
Lauren WhiteCarrot Insights Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marc MitchellFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Kinesiology, Western University, Arts & Humanities Building, Room 3R12B, London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada. marc.mitchell@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-9614
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health applications (mHealth apps) targeting physical inactivity have increased in popularity yet are usually limited by low engagement. This study examined the impact of adding team-based incentives (Step Together Challenges, STCs) to an existing mHealth app (Carrot Rewards) that rewarded individual physical activity achievements.

methodsA 24-week quasi-experimental study (retrospective matched pairs design) was conducted in three Canadian provinces (pre-intervention: weeks 1-12; intervention: weeks 13-24). Participants who used Carrot Rewards and STCs (experimental group) were matched with those who used Carrot Rewards only (controls) on age, gender, province and baseline mean daily step count (±500 steps/d). Carrot Rewards users earned individual-level incentives (worth $0.04 CAD) each day they reached a personalized daily step goal. With a single partner, STC users could earn team incentives ($0.40 CAD) for collaboratively reaching individual daily step goals 10 times in seven days (e.g., Partner A completes four goals and Partner B completes six goals in a week).

resultsThe main analysis included 61,170 users (mean age = 32 yrs.; % female = 64). Controlling for pre-intervention mean daily step count, a significant difference in intervention mean daily step count favoured the experimental group (p < 0.0001; η

conclusionDespite an explosion of physical activity app interest, low engagement leading to small or no effects remains an industry hallmark. In this paper, we found that adding modest team-based incentives to the Carrot Rewards app increased mean daily step count, and importantly, app engagement moderated this effect. Others should consider novel small-teams based approaches to boost engagement and effects.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMobile ApplicationsRewardAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFitness TrackersHumansMaleMotivationWalkingBehavioural economicsmHealthPhysical activityPublic healthRewardsSocial relatedness

Identifiers

PMID33208166
PMCPMC7677847
OpenAlexW3105750426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.