ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Novel GAN-Based Synthesis Method for In-Air Handwritten Words.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-Learning-Based Character Recognition from Handwriting Motion Data Captured Using IMU and Force Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A conditional GAN-based approach for enhancing transfer learning performance in few-shot HCR tasks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, with the miniaturization and high energy efficiency of MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems), in-air handwriting technology based on inertial sensors has come to the fore. Most of the previous works have focused on character-level in-air handwriting recognition. In contrast, few works focus on word-level in-air handwriting tasks. In the field of word-level recognition, researchers have to face the problems of insufficient data and poor generalization performance of recognition methods. On one hand, the training of deep neural learning networks usually requires a particularly large dataset, but collecting data will take a lot of time and money. On the other hand, a deep recognition network trained on a small dataset can hardly recognize samples whose labels do not appear in the training set. To address these problems, we propose a two-stage synthesis method of in-air handwritten words. The proposed method includes a splicing module guided by an additional corpus and a generating module trained by adversarial learning. We carefully design the proposed network so that it can handle word sample inputs of arbitrary length and pay more attention to the details of the samples. We design multiple sets of experiments on a public dataset. The experimental results demonstrate the success of the proposed method. What is impressive is that with the help of the air-writing word synthesizer, the recognition model learns the context information (combination information of characters) of the word. In this way, it can recognize words that have never appeared in the training process. In this paper, the recognition model trained on synthetic data achieves a word-level recognition accuracy of 62.3% on the public dataset. Compared with the model trained using only the public dataset, the word-level accuracy is improved by 62%. Furthermore, the proposed method can synthesize realistic samples under the condition of limited of in-air handwritten character samples and word samples. It largely solves the problem of insufficient data. In the future, mathematically modeling the strokes between characters in words may help us find a better way to splice character samples. In addition, we will apply our method to various datasets and improve the splicing module and generating module for different tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.