Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207777›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Technical and Methodological Aspects of Cell-Free Nucleic Acids Analyzes.

Zuzana Pös, Ondrej Pös, Jakub Styk, Angelika Mocova, Lucia Strieskova, Jaroslav Budis, Ludevit Kadasi, Jan Radvanszky, Tomas Szemes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zuzana PösInstitute of Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-4809
Ondrej PösDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-2285
Jakub StykComenius University Science Park, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Angelika MocovaInstitute of Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Lucia StrieskovaGeneton Ltd., 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jaroslav BudisGeneton Ltd., 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8667-6655
Ludevit KadasiInstitute of Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jan RadvanszkyInstitute of Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-9657-1198
Tomas SzemesDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund, OP Integrated Infrastructure for the project ITMS: 313011V578European Regional Development Fund, OP Integrated Infrastructure for the project ITMS: 313011W428The Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences Project ID: VEGA_2/0167/20The Slovak Research and Development Agency Project ID: APVV-18-0319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzes of cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) have shown huge potential in many biomedical applications, gradually entering several fields of research and everyday clinical care. Many biological properties of cfNAs can be informative to gain deeper insights into the function of the organism, such as their different types (DNA, RNAs) and subtypes (gDNA, mtDNA, bacterial DNA, miRNAs, etc.), forms (naked or vesicle bound NAs), fragmentation profiles, sequence composition, epigenetic modifications, and many others. On the other hand, the workflows of their analyzes comprise many important steps, from sample collection, storage and transportation, through extraction and laboratory analysis, up to bioinformatic analyzes and statistical evaluations, where each of these steps has the potential to affect the outcome and informational value of the performed analyzes. There are, however, no universal or standard protocols on how to exactly proceed when analyzing different cfNAs for different applications, at least according to our best knowledge. We decided therefore to prepare an overview of the available literature and products commercialized for cfNAs processing, in an attempt to summarize the benefits and limitations of the currently available approaches, devices, consumables, and protocols, together with various factors influencing the workflow, its processes, and outcomes.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, BacterialDNA, MitochondrialRNA, BacterialRNA, MitochondrialCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, BacterialDNA, MitochondrialRNA, BacterialRNA, Mitochondrialbody fluidscell-free nucleic acidsdownstream analysisexosomesextractionquantificationsample collectionstorage

Identifiers

PMID33207777
PMCPMC7697251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.