Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207764›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Polymeric Gelatin Scaffolds Affect Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Its Diverse Applications in Tissue Engineering.

Chia-Yu Wang, Po-Da Hong, Ding-Han Wang, Juin-Hong Cherng, Shu-Jen Chang, Cheng-Che Liu, Tong-Jing Fang, Yi-Wen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Polymeric Scaffolds: Design, Processing, and Biomedical Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chia-Yu WangDepartment of Materials Sciences and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Po-Da HongDepartment of Materials Sciences and Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Ding-Han WangDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3314-6113
Juin-Hong CherngLaboratory of Adult Stem Cell and Tissue Regeneration, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-6134
Shu-Jen ChangLaboratory of Adult Stem Cell and Tissue Regeneration, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-057X
Cheng-Che LiuDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-2511
Tong-Jing FangDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Yi-Wen WangDepartment and Graduate Institute of Biology and Anatomy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of National Defense MAB106-077, MAB108-003Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 109-2320-B-016-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies using polymeric scaffolds for various biomedical applications, such as tissue engineering, implants and medical substitutes, and drug delivery systems, have attempted to identify suitable material for tissue regeneration. This study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility and effectiveness of a gelatin scaffold seeded with human adipose stem cells (hASCs), including physical characteristics, multilineage differentiation in vitro, and osteogenic potential, in a rat model of a calvarial bone defect and to optimize its design. This functionalized scaffold comprised gelatin-hASCs layers to improve their efficacy in various biomedical applications. The gelatin scaffold exhibited excellent biocompatibility in vitro after two weeks of implantation. Furthermore, the gelatin scaffold supported and specifically regulated the proliferation and osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of hASCs, respectively. After 12 weeks of implantation, upon treatment with the gelatin-hASCs scaffold, the calvarial bone harboring the critical defect regenerated better and displayed greater osteogenic potential without any damage to the surrounding tissues compared to the untreated bone defect. These findings suggest that the present gelatin scaffold is a good potential carrier for stem cells in various tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCells, ImmobilizedMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSkullTissue EngineeringAnimalsGelatinHeterograftsHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue ScaffoldsGelatingelatinhuman adipose stem cellsmesoderm lineage-specific differentiationscaffoldtissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID33207764
PMCPMC7696434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.