Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207712›Full record

ArticlePolymers2020

An Overview on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Fabricated with Additive Manufacturing Technologies in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Szilard Rendeki, Balint Nagy, Matyas Bene, Attila Pentek, Luca Toth, Zalan Szanto, Roland Told, Peter Maroti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope, King VisionJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical waste plastic: bacteria, disinfection and recycling technologies-a comprehensive review.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 3D Printing in Eye Care.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Szilard RendekiMedical Simulation Education Center, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Balint NagyDepartment of Operational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Matyas Bene3D Printing and Visualization Centre, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Attila Pentek3D Printing and Visualization Centre, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Luca Toth3D Printing and Visualization Centre, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Zalan SzantoDepartment of Surgery, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Roland Told3D Printing and Visualization Centre, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.
Peter MarotiMedical Simulation Education Center, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-0675
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

Hungarian Science Foundation EFOP-3.6.1-16- 2016-00004Hungarian Science Foundation GINOP-2.3.2.-15-2016-00022Ministry of Innovation and Technology TUDFO/51757-1/2019-ITM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different additive manufacturing technologies have proven effective and useful in remote medicine and emergency or disaster situations. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, has had a huge impact on our society, including in relation to the continuous supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). The aim of the study is to give a detailed overview of 3D-printed PPE devices and provide practical information regarding the manufacturing and further design process, as well as describing the potential risks of using them. Open-source models of a half-face mask, safety goggles, and a face-protecting shield are evaluated, considering production time, material usage, and cost. Estimations have been performed with fused filament fabrication (FFF) and selective laser sintering (SLS) technology, highlighting the material characteristics of polylactic acid (PLA), polyamide, and a two-compound silicone. Spectrophotometry measurements of transparent PMMA samples were performed to determine their functionality as goggles or face mask parts. All the tests were carried out before and after the tetra-acetyl-ethylene-diamine (TAED)-based disinfection process. The results show that the disinfection has no significant effect on the mechanical and structural stability of the used polymers; therefore, 3D-printed PPE is reusable. For each device, recommendations and possible means of development are explained. The files of the modified models are provided. SLS and FFF additive manufacturing technology can be useful tools in PPE development and small-series production, but open-source models must be used with special care.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingCOVID-19mechanical testingpersonal protective equipmentPLApolyamidepolymersremote medicinesterilization

Identifiers

PMID33207712
PMCPMC7697679
OpenAlexW3099944456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.