Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207667›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Parental Vaccine Preferences for Their Children in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Tiantian Gong, Gang Chen, Ping Liu, Xiaozhen Lai, Hongguo Rong, Xiaochen Ma, Zhiyuan Hou, Hai Fang, Shunping Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiantian GongCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Gang ChenCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne 3145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-5965
Ping LiuCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Xiaozhen LaiSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Hongguo RongChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaochen MaChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Zhiyuan HouSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Hai FangChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Shunping LiCentre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8144-6220
Peking University · CNShandong University · CNFudan University · CNMonash University · AU

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71774006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

discrete choice experimentparental preferencevaccine

Identifiers

PMID33207667
PMCPMC7712304
OpenAlexW3103040709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.