ArticleVeterinary sciences2020
Ultrasonographic Monitoring in 38 Dogs with Clinically Suspected Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum pancreatitis-associated protein 1 concentrations in dogs with acute signs of gastrointestinal disease and normal or abnormal DGGR lipase activity.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- An Association between Pancreatic and Cholestatic Biliary Disorders in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Progression of lipase activity and pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity in dogs hospitalized for acute pancreatitis and correlation with clinical features.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2023Article
- Peripheral biomarkers of oxidative stress in dogs with acute pancreatitis.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022Article
- Prevalence of ultrasonographic gastrointestinal wall changes in dogs with acute pancreatitis: A retrospective study (2012-2020).Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022Article
- Accuracy of 1,2-o-Dilauryl-rac-glycero-3-glutaric Acid-(6'-methylresorufin) Ester (DGGR)-Lipase to Predict Canine Pancreas-Specific Lipase (cPL) and Diagnostic Accuracy of Both Tests for Canine Acute Pancreatitis.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Advances in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021Review
- Letter regarding "ACVIM consensus statement on pancreatitis in cats".Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021Article
- Serum Concentration of Inflammatory Cytokines in Dogs with Suspected Acute Pancreatitis.Veterinary sciences · 2021Article
- Hyperlipasemia in dogs with acute kidney injury treated with and without hemodialysis.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Comparison of Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasonographic Findings in Dogs With Acutely Presenting Clinical Signs and Either Normal or Increased Serum DGGR Lipase Activity.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Evaluation of Hyperlipasemia and Clinical Signs in 106 Dogs After Hospitalization for Acute Pancreatitis: Results From a Combined Retrospective and Prospective Follow-Up Study.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal ultrasound examinations (AUEs) are commonly used in the diagnostic evaluation of canine acute pancreatitis (AP). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and monitor the ultrasonographic changes observed in dogs with clinically suspected AP on consecutive AUEs. The study population was constituted by 38 client-owned dogs hospitalized for no less than 48 h from January 2016 to December 2019. Dogs included in this study were suspected of AP based on the clinical examination and abnormal rapid specific canine pancreatic lipase test performed at admission. Dogs were submitted to two AUEs, the first on the first day of hospitalization, and the second between 40-52 h after the first one. Twelve dogs had both AUEs suggestive of AP. Fourteen dogs received an ultrasonographic diagnosis of AP exclusively on the second AUE. Twelve dogs remained negative on both the first and the second AUE. In 26 out of 38 patients the second AUE was suggestive of AP. If a patient is suspected of AP, it is advisable to carry out ultrasonographic monitoring at least within the first 52 h after admission, since ultrasonographic signs of AP may only become observable later after hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.