Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207334›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

Validation of a CT-based motion model with in-situ fluoroscopy for lung surface deformation estimation.

M Ranjbar, P Sabouri, S Mossahebi, A Sawant, P Mohindra, G Lasio, L D Timmie Topoleski

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M RanjbarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
P SabouriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicines, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
S MossahebiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicines, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A SawantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicines, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
P MohindraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicines, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
G LasioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicines, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
L D Timmie TopoleskiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Funding

Personalized Motion Management for truly 4D Lung Stereotactic Body RadiotherapyR01CA169102 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAWANT, AMIT · 2013 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many surrogate-based motion models (SMMs), proposed to guide motion management in radiotherapy, are constructed by correlating motion of an external surrogate and internal anatomy during CT-simulation. Changes in this correlation define model break down. We validate a methodology that incorporates fluoroscopic (FL) images acquired during treatment for SMM construction and update. Under a prospective IRB, 4DCT scans, VisionRT (VRT) surfaces, and orthogonal FLs were collected from five lung cancer patients. VRT surfaces and two FL time-series were acquired pre- and post-treatment. A simulated annealing optimization scheme was used to estimate optimal lung deformations by maximizing the mutual information (MI) between digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) of the SMM-estimated 3D images and FLs. Our SMM used partial-least-regression and was trained using the optimal deformations and VRT surfaces from the first breathing-cycle. SMM performance was evaluated using the MI score between reference FLs and the corresponding SMM or phase-assigned 4DCT DRRs. The Hausdorff distance for contoured landmarks was used to evaluate target position estimation error. For four out of five patients, two principal components approximated lung surface deformations with submillimeter accuracy. Analysis of the MI score between more than 4000 pairs of FL and DRR demonstrated that our model led to more similarity between the FL and DRR images compared to 4DCT and DRR images from a model based on an a priori correlation model. Our SMM consistently displayed lower mean and 95th percentile Hausdorff distances. For one patient, 95th percentile Hausdorff distance was reduced by 11 mm. Patient-averaged reductions in mean and 95th percentile Hausdorff distances were 3.6 mm and 7 mm for right-lung, and 3.1 mm and 4 mm for left-lung targets. FL data were used to evaluate model performance and investigate the feasibility of model update. Despite variability in breathing, use of post-treatment FL preserved model fidelity and consistently outperformed 4DCT for position estimation.

Indexed as

FluoroscopyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyModels, BiologicalMovementHumansLungRespiration

Identifiers

PMID33207334
PMCPMC7906954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.