Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207217›Full record

ArticleCell stem cell2021

Cell Surface Mechanics Gate Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation.

Martin Bergert, Sergio Lembo, Sumana Sharma, Luigi Russo, Danica Milovanović, Kristjan H Gretarsson, Mandy Börmel, Pierre A Neveu, Jamie A Hackett, Evangelia Petsalaki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stem cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tension TRAAKer: a chemigenetic fluorescent membrane tension reporter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Current advancements in nanotechnology for stem cells.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martin BergertCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sergio LemboCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sumana SharmaEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Luigi RussoCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Danica MilovanovićCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristjan H GretarssonEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Via Ramarini 32, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Mandy BörmelElectron Microscopy Core Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Pierre A NeveuCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jamie A HackettEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Via Ramarini 32, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Evangelia PetsalakiEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Alba Diz-MuñozCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: diz@embl.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell differentiation typically occurs with concomitant shape transitions to enable specialized functions. To adopt a different shape, cells need to change the mechanical properties of their surface. However, whether cell surface mechanics control the process of differentiation has been relatively unexplored. Here we show that membrane mechanics gate exit from naive pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells. By measuring membrane tension during early differentiation, we find that naive stem cells release their plasma membrane from the underlying actin cortex when transitioning to a primed state. By mechanically tethering the plasma membrane to the cortex by enhancing Ezrin activity or expressing a synthetic signaling-inert linker, we demonstrate that preventing this detachment forces stem cells to retain their naive pluripotent identity. We thus identify a decrease in membrane-to-cortex attachment as a new cell-intrinsic mechanism that is essential for stem cells to exit pluripotency.

Indexed as

Embryonic Stem CellsMouse Embryonic Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MembraneMiceSignal Transductionatomic force spectroscopyexit from pluripotencymembrane tensionmembrane-to-cortex attachment (MCA)mESCnaive-to-primed transition

Identifiers

PMID33207217
PMCPMC7875094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.