Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33207025›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2021

Impact of policy changes on the provision of naloxone by pharmacies in Ontario, Canada: a population-based time-series analysis.

Tony Antoniou, Diana Martins, Tonya Campbell, Mina Tadrous, Charlotte Munro, Pamela Leece, Muhammad Mamdani, David N Juurlink, Tara Gomes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical outcomes and health care costs among people entering a safer opioid supply program in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. An economic evaluation of community pharmacy-dispensed naloxone in Canada.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tony AntoniouLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diana MartinsLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tonya CampbellICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlotte MunroOntario Drug Policy Research Network Lived Experience Advisory Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pamela LeecePublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David N JuurlinkICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-1965
St. Michael's Hospital · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAOntario Drug Policy Research Network · CAPublic Health Ontario · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 410281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIn June 2016, the Ontario, Canada government implemented the Ontario Naloxone Program for Pharmacies (ONPP), authorizing pharmacists to provide injectable naloxone kits at no charge to all Ontario residents. In March 2018, the program was amended to include intranasal naloxone and remove the requirement to present a government health card to the dispensing pharmacist. We examined whether these changes increased naloxone dispensing through the ONPP.

designPopulation-based time-series analysis using interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models.

settingOntario, Canada.

participantsAll Ontario residents between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020. MEASUREMENTS: Monthly rates of pharmacy naloxone dispensing.

findingsOverall, 199 484 individuals were dispensed a naloxone kit during the study period. In the main analysis, the rate of pharmacy naloxone dispensing increased by 65.1% following program changes (55.6-91.8 kits per 100 000 population between February 2018 and May 2018; P = 0.01). In subgroup analyses, naloxone dispensing increased among individuals receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) (3374.9-7264.2 kits per 100 000 OAT recipients; P = 0.04) among individuals receiving other prescription opioids (192.8-381.8 kits per 100 000 population prescribed opioids; P < 0.01), among individuals with past opioid exposure (134.7-205.6 kits per 100 000 population with past opioid exposure; P < 0.01) and in urban centers (56.2-91.4 kits per 100 000 population; P < 0.01). We did not observe a clear impact on pharmacy-dispensed naloxone to individuals with no or unknown opioid exposure (34.4-39.3 kits per 100 000 population with no/unknown opioid exposure; P = 0.42) and in rural regions (50.4-97.2 kits per 100 000 population; P = 0.09).

conclusionsChanges to the Ontario Naloxone Program for Pharmacies to add intranasal naloxone and remove the requirement to present a government health card appeared to increase pharmacy-based naloxone dispensing uptake in Ontario, Canada, particularly among individuals at high risk of inadvertent opioid overdose.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNaloxoneOpioid-Related DisordersPharmaciesAnalgesics, OpioidHumansNarcotic AntagonistsOntarioPolicyAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsDrug policyharm reductionhealth services researchnaloxoneopioidpolicy evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33207025
PMCPMC8247272
OpenAlexW3104055437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.