ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020
OCCAM: prediction of small ORFs in bacterial genomes by means of a target-decoy database approach and machine learning techniques.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing toxin-mediated ribosome stalling as a complementary tool to annotate bacterial ORFs.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- SVNeoPP: A Workflow for Structural-Variant-Derived Neoantigen Prediction and Prioritization Using Multi-Omics Data.Biology · 2026Article
- Exploring microproteins from various model organisms using the mip-mining database.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small open reading frames (ORFs) have been systematically disregarded by automatic genome annotation. The difficulty in finding patterns in tiny sequences is the main reason that makes small ORFs to be overlooked by computational procedures. However, advances in experimental methods show that small proteins can play vital roles in cellular activities. Hence, it is urgent to make progress in the development of computational approaches to speed up the identification of potential small ORFs. In this work, our focus is on bacterial genomes. We improve a previous approach to identify small ORFs in bacteria. Our method uses machine learning techniques and decoy subject sequences to filter out spurious ORF alignments. We show that an advanced multivariate analysis can be more effective in terms of sensitivity than applying the simplistic and widely used e-value cutoff. This is particularly important in the case of small ORFs for which alignments present higher e-values than usual. Experiments with control datasets show that the machine learning algorithms used in our method to curate significant alignments can achieve average sensitivity and specificity of 97.06% and 99.61%, respectively. Therefore, an important step is provided here toward the construction of more accurate computational tools for the identification of small ORFs in bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.