Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206960›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2020

OCCAM: prediction of small ORFs in bacterial genomes by means of a target-decoy database approach and machine learning techniques.

Fabio R Cerqueira, Ana Tereza Ribeiro Vasconcelos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio R CerqueiraDepartment of Production Engineering, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Domingos Silvério s/n, Petrópolis, 25 650-050, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana Tereza Ribeiro VasconcelosLaboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, Rua Getúlio Vargas 333, Petropólis, 25 651-071, Brazil.
Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small open reading frames (ORFs) have been systematically disregarded by automatic genome annotation. The difficulty in finding patterns in tiny sequences is the main reason that makes small ORFs to be overlooked by computational procedures. However, advances in experimental methods show that small proteins can play vital roles in cellular activities. Hence, it is urgent to make progress in the development of computational approaches to speed up the identification of potential small ORFs. In this work, our focus is on bacterial genomes. We improve a previous approach to identify small ORFs in bacteria. Our method uses machine learning techniques and decoy subject sequences to filter out spurious ORF alignments. We show that an advanced multivariate analysis can be more effective in terms of sensitivity than applying the simplistic and widely used e-value cutoff. This is particularly important in the case of small ORFs for which alignments present higher e-values than usual. Experiments with control datasets show that the machine learning algorithms used in our method to curate significant alignments can achieve average sensitivity and specificity of 97.06% and 99.61%, respectively. Therefore, an important step is provided here toward the construction of more accurate computational tools for the identification of small ORFs in bacteria.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialMachine LearningAlgorithmsOpen Reading FramesProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33206960
PMCPMC7673341
OpenAlexW3102524682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.