Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206913›Full record

SynthesisSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina

Environmental cleaning to prevent COVID-19 infection. A rapid systematic review.

Patrícia Mitsue Saruhashi Shimabukuro, Márcio Luís Duarte, Aline Mizusaki Imoto, Álvaro Nagib Atallah, Eduardo Signorini Bicas Franco, Maria Stella Peccin, Mônica Taminato

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Serendipitous Outcome of COVID-19: Modifications to ICU Management.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrícia Mitsue Saruhashi ShimabukuroNurse, Hospital Sancta Maggiore São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil; Master's Student, Master's Program, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-0611
Márcio Luís DuarteMD, MSc. Musculoskeletal Radiologist, Webimagem, São Paulo (SP), Brazil; Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-9332
Aline Mizusaki ImotoPT, PhD. Professor, Professional and Academic Master's Program in Health Sciences, Evidence-Based Health Laboratory, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-4658
Álvaro Nagib AtallahMD, PhD. Head of Department of Evidence-Based Health, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0890-594X
Eduardo Signorini Bicas FrancoPT, MSc. Doctoral student, Department of Evidence-Based Health, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2754-4369
Maria Stella PeccinPT, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Human Movement Sciences, and Advisor of Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-4588
Mônica TaminatoPhD. Nurse, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem (EPE), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-2496
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BREscola Superior de Ciências da Saúde · BRHermes Microvision (United States) · USHospital São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaced with a pandemic, all healthcare actions need to reflect best practices, in order to avoid high transmissibility, complications and even hospitalizations. For hospital environments, the products recommended and authorized by regulatory institutions for environmental cleaning and disinfection need to be highly effective.

objectiveTo identify, systematically evaluate and summarize the best available scientific evidence on environmental cleaning to prevent COVID-19 infection. DESIGN AND

settingA systematic review of studies analyzing cleaning products that inactivate coronavirus, conducted within the evidence-based health program of a federal university in São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

methodsA systematic search of the relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and LILACS databases, for articles published up to May 27, 2020, relating to studies evaluating cleaning products that inactivate coronavirus in the environment.

resultsSeven studies were selected. These analyzed use of 70% alcohol, detergent, detergent containing iodine, household bleach, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, chlorine dioxide, glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet irradiation and plasma air purifier. The effectiveness of treating sewage with sodium hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide was also evaluated.

conclusionDisinfection of environments, especially those in ordinary use, such as bathrooms, needs to be done constantly. Viral inactivation was achieved using chlorine-based disinfectants, alcohol, detergents, glutaraldehyde, iodine-containing detergents, hydrogen peroxide compounds and household bleaches. Alcohol showed efficient immediate activity. In sewage, sodium hypochlorite had better action than chlorine dioxide. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YC5P4 in the Open Science Framework.

Indexed as

BrazilCOVID-19DisinfectantsDisinfectionHumansInfection ControlDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID33206913
PMCPMC9685573
OpenAlexW3100502902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.