Formal Comment: Romer study fails at following core principles of reanalysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Towards the Influence of Media on Suicidality: A Systematic Review of Netflix's 'Thirteen Reasons Why'.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
   Pooled it
2. Reanalysis of the effects of "13 Reasons Why": Response to Bridge et al.PloS one · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reanalysis of the effects of "13 Reasons Why": Response to Bridge et al.2020
• Comment on
  Reanalysis of the Bridge et al. study of suicide following release of 13 Reasons Why.2020
• Comment on
  Association Between the Release of Netflix's 13 Reasons Why and Suicide Rates in the United States: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.2020

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as