ArticleDevelopmental science2021
Sampling to learn words: Adults and children sample words that reduce referential ambiguity.
Article in Developmental science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Knowledge: Effects of State Curiosity on Children's Word Learning and Information Seeking.Developmental science · 2026Article
- No Evidence for Curiosity-Driven Information Selection Advantage in Infants' Novel Word Learning.Developmental science · 2026Article
- Seeking Meaning: Incorporating Linguistic Information in Cross-Situational Verb Learning.Cognitive science · 2025Article
- Preschoolers Selectively Attend to Speech That They Can Learn More From.Developmental science · 2025Article
- Children's subjective uncertainty-driven sampling behaviour.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- The quality of caregiver-child interaction is predicted by (caregivers' perception of) their child's interests.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Attention Shifts to More Complex Structures With Experience.Psychological science · 2022Article
- Acquiring Complex Communicative Systems: Statistical Learning of Language and Emotion.Topics in cognitive science · 2022Review
- The infant's view redefines the problem of referential uncertainty in early word learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Parent-Child Joint Behaviors in Novel Object Play Create High-Quality Data for Word Learning.Child development · 2021Article
- Cross-situational Learning From Ambiguous Egocentric Input Is a Continuous Process: Evidence Using the Human Simulation Paradigm.Cognitive science · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How do learners gather new information during word learning? One possibility is that learners selectively sample items that help them reduce uncertainty about new word meanings. In a series of cross-situational word learning tasks with adults and children, we manipulated the referential ambiguity of label-object pairs experienced during training and subsequently investigated which words participants chose to sample additional information about. In the first experiment, adult learners chose to receive additional training on object-label associations that reduce referential ambiguity during cross-situational word learning. This ambiguity-reduction strategy was related to improved test performance. In two subsequent experiments, we found that, at least in some contexts, children (3-8 years of age) show a similar preference to seek information about words experienced in ambiguous word learning situations. In Experiment 2, children did not preferentially select object-label associations that remained ambiguous during cross-situational word learning. However, in a third experiment that increased the relative ambiguity of two sets of novel object-label associations, we found evidence that children preferentially make selections that reduce ambiguity about novel word meanings. These results carry implications for understanding how children actively contribute to their own language development by seeking information that supports learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.