ArticleBJU international2021
Prostate cancer grading, time to go back to the future.
Article in BJU international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopsy Gleason score 5 + 4 predicts worse outcomes than 4 + 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a nationwide multicenter cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Prostate cancer characteristics in fathers and risk of early onset high-risk prostate cancer in sons.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Tumor evolution metrics predict recurrence beyond 10 years in locally advanced prostate cancer.Nature cancer · 2024Article
- Prognosis of Gleason score 8 prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies: a nationwide population-based study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Oncological and urinary outcomes following low-dose-rate brachytherapy with a median follow-up of 11.8 years.BJU international · 2022Article
- Prognostic differences among Grade Group 4 subgroups in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.BJUI compass · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.