Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206434›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2021

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 natural animal reservoirs and experimental models: systematic review.

Salma Younes, Nadin Younes, Farah Shurrab, Gheyath K Nasrallah

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Reflections after 2 years of COVID-19 pandemic.Reviews in medical virology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The zoonotic and natural foci characteristics of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of biosafety and biosecurity · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salma YounesBiomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Nadin YounesBiomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Farah ShurrabBiomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Gheyath K NasrallahBiomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-1038
Qatar University · QA

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund RRC-2-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak has been rapidly spreading worldwide, causing serious global concern. The role that animal hosts play in disease transmission is still understudied and researchers wish to find suitable animal models for fundamental research and drug discovery. In this systematic review, we aimed to compile and discuss all articles that describe experimental or natural infections with SARS-CoV-2, from the initial discovery of the virus in December 2019 through to October 2020. We systematically searched four databases (Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science). The following data were extracted from the included studies: type of infection (natural or experimental), age, sample numbers, dose, route of inoculation, viral replication, detection method, clinical symptoms and transmission. Fifty-four studies were included, of which 34 were conducted on animal reservoirs (naturally or experimentally infected), and 20 involved models for testing vaccines and therapeutics. Our search revealed that Rousettus aegyptiacus (fruit bats), pangolins, felines, mink, ferrets and rabbits were all susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, while dogs were weakly susceptible and pigs, poultry, and tree shrews were not. In addition, virus replication in mice, mink, hamsters and ferrets resembled subclinical human infection, so these animals might serve as useful models for future studies to evaluate vaccines or antiviral agents and to study host-pathogen interactions. Our review comprehensively summarized current evidence on SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals and their usefulness as models for studying vaccines and antiviral drugs. Our findings may direct future studies for vaccine development, antiviral drugs and therapeutic agents to manage SARS-CoV-2-caused diseases.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCOVID-19Disease ReservoirsDisease SusceptibilitySevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusanimal hostsanimal modelsCovid-19SARS-CoV-2therapeutic agentsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID33206434
PMCPMC7744864
OpenAlexW3105141309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.