Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206343›Full record

ReviewRheumatology and therapy2020

Understanding and Minimising Injection-Site Pain Following Subcutaneous Administration of Biologics: A Narrative Review.

Anja St Clair-Jones, Francesca Prignano, Joao Goncalves, Muriel Paul, Philipp Sewerin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Anja St Clair-JonesPharmacy Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK. anja.st.clair-jones@nhs.net.
Francesca PrignanoSection of Dermatology, Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Joao GoncalvesiMed-Research Institute for Medicines, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Muriel PaulDepartment of Pharmacy, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
Philipp SewerinDepartment and Hiller Research Unit of Rheumatology, University Clinic Düsseldorf (UKD), Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injection-site pain (ISP) is a subjective side effect that is commonly reported with the subcutaneous administration of biological agents, yet it may only be a concern to some. Multiple factors related to the product formulation, such as pH, volume and excipients, and/or to the injection process have the potential to contribute to ISP, while patient-related factors, such as low body weight, gender and age, can make an individual more susceptible to experiencing ISP. While total elimination of ISP remains unlikely with any subcutaneously administered agent, it can be minimised by helping the patient to develop a confident and competent injection technique via robust and effective training. Careful management of patient expectations along with open discussion regarding the potential risk of ISP may serve to minimise treatment-related anxieties and, importantly, allow the patient to remain in control of his/her treatment. Other interventions to help minimise ISP include psychological interventions, allowing biologics to reach room temperature prior to injection, using the most suitable injection device for the individual patient and selecting an alternative drug formulation, when available. Productive patient-physician communication remains important in order to support and optimise treatment experience and adherence, while also providing the opportunity for patients to discuss any ISP-related issues.

Indexed as

BiosimilarFormulationInjection processInjection-site painPatient–physician communicationSubcutaneousTraining

Identifiers

PMID33206343
PMCPMC7672413
OpenAlexW3101734241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.