Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206220›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

The impact of the 2011 US Food and Drug Administration transvaginal mesh communication on utilization of synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures.

Alexander A Berger, Jasmine Tan-Kim, Shawn A Menefee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander A BergerDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. alexanderbergermd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-7520
Jasmine Tan-KimDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, 3250 Fordham Street, Bldg A, Obstetrics/Gynecology Department, San Diego, CA, 92110, USA.
Shawn A MenefeeDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, 3250 Fordham Street, Bldg A, Obstetrics/Gynecology Department, San Diego, CA, 92110, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Kaiser Permanente KP-RRC-20171101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe sought to examine the change in utilization of the midurethral sling (MUS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after the 2011 US FDA communication regarding transvaginal mesh.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study evaluating surgical utilization of MUS at a managed care organization of 4.5 million patients from 2008 to 2016. The primary outcome was the change in utilization of synthetic mesh MUS before and after the July 2011 FDA communication. Secondary outcomes were the changes in surgeon level MUS utilization.

resultsMUS procedures decreased from 131 to 116 per 100,000 adult women with a decrease of 11.5% from 2010 to 2012. Year over year utilization of MUS was rapidly increasing (p < 0.01) prior the FDA communication from 116 (in 2008) to 131 (in 2010) per 100,000 women and then significantly declined (p < 0.01) after its release from 135 (in 2011) to 75 (in 2016) per 100,000 women (13% increase vs 44% decrease). The number of surgeons performing MUS increased (p < 0.01) from 172/year to 186/year from 2008 to 2010 (Table 1). This decreased (p < 0.01) from 183/year to 121/year from 2011 to 2016.

conclusionsMUS for SUI drastically declined after the FDA communication. Despite the 2011 FDA communication concerning only transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, there was a significant decrease in MUS with synthetic mesh utilization. Our findings support the importance of continued long-term outcome data regarding the safety and efficacy of MUS and highlight the impact of the FDA warning on MUS utilization.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationFDAFemale pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeryFood and Drug AdministrationMeshMidurethral sling

Identifiers

PMID33206220
OpenAlexW3098610772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.