ArticleJAMA network open2020
Predictive Modeling for Perinatal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Incidence and predictors of mortality among low birth weight neonates in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- The role of chest X-ray in the diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review concerning low-resource birth scenarios.Global health action · 2024Pooled it
- On usage of artificial intelligence for predicting mortality during and post-pregnancy: a systematic review of literature.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Usability and Workflow Integration of a Machine Learning-Derived Neonatal Risk Predictor in Kenyan Neonatal Units: Multisite User-Centered Pilot Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Drug Market's Impact on the Overdose Risk Environment for Women Who Use Drugs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- Leakage-Controlled and Survey-Weighted Machine Learning for Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Using NFHS-5 Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prenatal exposure to flood and risk of low birth weight: a multi-country study from 36 African countries.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Kenyan Neonatal Mortality Risk Predictor: Protocol for a User-Centered Design Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered models in predicting mortality in maternal, newborn, and children under five: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Governance pathways for scaling neonatal risk stratification tools in LMIC health systems: a multi-site qualitative study in Kenya.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Understanding drivers of neonatal mortality in Zimbabwe: A machine learning approach using survey data.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Machine learning to predict the role of CHWs in shifting birth preferences away from homebirth in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning for preventing stillbirths: is it possible to transform data into life-saving insights?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in maternal and child health: Progress, controversies, and future directions.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Article
- The early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by machine learning models.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Antenatal care quality and detection of risk among pregnant women: An observational study in Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and South Africa.PLoS medicine · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The overwhelming majority of fetal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Fetal and neonatal risk assessment tools may be useful to predict the risk of death. Objective: To develop risk prediction models for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research population-based vital registry, including clinical sites in South Asia (India and Pakistan), Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, and Kenya), and Latin America (Guatemala). A total of 502 648 pregnancies were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Exposures: Risk factors were added sequentially into the data set in 4 scenarios: (1) prenatal, (2) predelivery, (3) delivery and day 1, and (4) postdelivery through day 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data sets were randomly divided into 10 groups of 3 analysis data sets including training (60%), test (20%), and validation (20%). Conventional and advanced machine learning modeling techniques were applied to assess predictive abilities using area under the curve (AUC) for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Results: All prenatal and predelivery models had predictive accuracy for both intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality with AUC values 0.71 or less. Five of 6 models for neonatal mortality based on delivery/day 1 and postdelivery/day 2 had increased predictive accuracy with AUC values greater than 0.80. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal death in both postdelivery scenarios with independent predictive ability with AUC values of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. The addition of 4 other top predictors increased AUC to 0.83 and 0.87 for the postdelivery scenarios, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Models based on prenatal or predelivery data had predictive accuracy for intrapartum stillbirths and neonatal mortality of AUC values 0.71 or less. Models that incorporated delivery data had good predictive accuracy for risk of neonatal mortality. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.