Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33206194›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Predictive Modeling for Perinatal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings.

Vivek V Shukla, Barry Eggleston, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Elizabeth M McClure, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Carl Bose, Melissa Bauserman, Antoinette Tshefu, Shivaprasad S Goudar and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Drug Market's Impact on the Overdose Risk Environment for Women Who Use Drugs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Vivek V ShuklaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Barry EgglestonRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Namasivayam AmbalavananUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Elizabeth M McClureRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Musaku MwenechanyaUTH-Children's Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Elwyn ChombaUniversity Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Carl BoseUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Melissa BausermanUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Antoinette TshefuKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Shivaprasad S GoudarKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, J. N. Medical College, Belgaum, India.
Richard J DermanThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ana GarcésINCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Nancy F KrebsUniversity of Colorado, Denver.
Sarah SaleemAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Robert L GoldenbergColumbia University, New York, New York.
Archana PatelLata Medical Research Foundation, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
Patricia L HibberdBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Fabian EsamaiMoi University School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Sherri BucherIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Edward A LiechtyIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Marion Koso-ThomasEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland.
Waldemar A CarloUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.

Funding

Zika in Pregnancy Supplemental Funding requestU01HD040636 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI MCCLURE, ELIZABETH M · 2001 to 2017
$37.5M
Evidence-Based Global Health Interventions for Mothers and Children, ArgentinaU01HD040477 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUEKENS, PIERRE · 2001 to 2013
$5.6M
The University of North Carolina-Kinshasa School of Public Health Research Partnership in the Democratic Republic of Congo; a Model for Improving Women'sand Children's Health Through ResearchUG1HD076465 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MELISSA SCHWEIKHART BAUSERMAN · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
Boston University/Lata Medical Research Foundation Global Network for Women's Children's Health Research UnitUG1HD078439 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Patricia L Hibberd · 2018 to 2026
$5.5M
TJU-JNMC Global Network for Women's & Children's Health Research UnitUG1HD076457 · NICHD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARD J DERMAN · 2018 to 2026
$5.5M
Nutrition-specific interventions to improve long-term maternal-child health outcomesUG1HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Edwin Jose Asturias, NANCY F KREBS · 2018 to 2026
$5.4M
The Global Network and Preconception Maternal NutritionU10HD076474 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAMBIDGE, K MICHAEL, KREBS, NANCY F · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
Columbia University/Aga Khan University Global Network Research UnitUG1HD078438 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROBERT L GOLDENBERG · 2018 to 2026
$5.1M
Global Network for Women's and Children's Health ResearchU10HD076461 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LIECHTY, EDWARD A. · 2013 to 2017
$4.1M
CCHS-JNMC Global Network for Women's & Children's Health Research UnitU10HD076457 · NICHD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DERMAN, RICHARD J · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
Heart Rate Detection during Resuucitation to Reduce Early Neonatal MortalityU10HD078437 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CARLO FONT, WALDEMAR A. · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
Global Network for Women's and Children's Health ResearchUG1HD076461 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BUCHER, SHERRI LYNN, SZYLD, EDGARDO GABRIEL · 2018 to 2023
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040477NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040636NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076457NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076461NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076465NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD076474NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD078437NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD078438NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD078439NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076457NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076461NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076465NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD076474NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078438NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The overwhelming majority of fetal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Fetal and neonatal risk assessment tools may be useful to predict the risk of death. Objective: To develop risk prediction models for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research population-based vital registry, including clinical sites in South Asia (India and Pakistan), Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, and Kenya), and Latin America (Guatemala). A total of 502 648 pregnancies were prospectively enrolled in the registry. Exposures: Risk factors were added sequentially into the data set in 4 scenarios: (1) prenatal, (2) predelivery, (3) delivery and day 1, and (4) postdelivery through day 2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data sets were randomly divided into 10 groups of 3 analysis data sets including training (60%), test (20%), and validation (20%). Conventional and advanced machine learning modeling techniques were applied to assess predictive abilities using area under the curve (AUC) for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Results: All prenatal and predelivery models had predictive accuracy for both intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality with AUC values 0.71 or less. Five of 6 models for neonatal mortality based on delivery/day 1 and postdelivery/day 2 had increased predictive accuracy with AUC values greater than 0.80. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal death in both postdelivery scenarios with independent predictive ability with AUC values of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. The addition of 4 other top predictors increased AUC to 0.83 and 0.87 for the postdelivery scenarios, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Models based on prenatal or predelivery data had predictive accuracy for intrapartum stillbirths and neonatal mortality of AUC values 0.71 or less. Models that incorporated delivery data had good predictive accuracy for risk of neonatal mortality. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

AdultBirth WeightCohort StudiesCongoFemaleGuatemalaHealth ResourcesHumansIndiaInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornKenyaMalePakistanPerinatal Death

Identifiers

PMID33206194
PMCPMC7675108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.