ArticleJAMA psychiatry2021
Leveraging Basic Science for the Clinic-From Bench to Bedside.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- How will developmental neuroimaging contribute to the prediction of neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders? Challenges and opportunities.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Different learning aberrations relate to delusion-like beliefs with different contents.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Lesions to the mediodorsal thalamus, but not orbitofrontal cortex, enhance volatility beliefs linked to paranoia.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Transdiagnostic Anxiety-Related Increases in Information Sampling are Associated With Altered Valuation.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- The Added Value of Crosstalk Between Developmental Circuit Neuroscience and Clinical Practice to Inform the Treatment of Adolescent Anxiety.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Review
- Variables influencing conditioning-evoked hallucinations: overview and future applications.Psychological medicine · 2022Review
- Relating Glutamate, Conditioned, and Clinical Hallucinations via 1H-MR Spectroscopy.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Assessing positive and negative valence systems to refine animal models of bipolar disorders: the example of GBR 12909-induced manic phenotype.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A framework for integration of dimensional and diagnostic approaches to the diagnosis of schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The tools and insights of behavioral neuroscience grow apace, yet their clinical application is lagging. Observations: This article suggests that associative learning theory may be the algorithmic bridge to connect a burgeoning understanding of the brain with the challenges to the mind with which all clinicians and researchers are concerned. Conclusions and Relevance: Instead of giving up, talking past one another, or resting on the laurels of face validity, a consilient and collaborative approach is suggested: visiting laboratory meetings and clinical rounds and attempting to converse in the language of behavior and cognition to better understand and ultimately treat patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.