ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020
Analysis of the vaginal microbiome of giant pandas using metagenomics sequencing.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function in the Gut of South China Tigers Under Different Dietary Treatments.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Safeguarding a Flagship Species: Integrated Surveillance of Cross-Species Pathogen Transmission in Giant Panda Ecosystems.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Low Reproductivity of Giant Pandas May Be Associated with Increased VaginalMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- High-throughput sequencing and characterization of potentially pathogenic fungi from the vaginal mycobiome of giant panda (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Age-related alterations in metabolome and microbiome provide insights in dietary transition in giant pandas.mSystems · 2023Article
- The Connection between Immunocompetence and Reproduction in Wildlife.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Heat Stress Altered the Vaginal Microbiome and Metabolome in Rabbits.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Update on theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Interactions between reproductive biology and microbiomes in wild animal species.Animal microbiome · 2021Review
- Contrasting Vaginal Bacterial Communities Between Estrus and Non-estrus of Giant Pandas (Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a total of 14 vaginal samples (GPV1-14) from giant pandas were analyzed. These vaginal samples were divided into two groups as per the region and age of giant pandas. All the vaginal samples were analyzed using metagenomic sequencing. As per the outcomes of metagenomic analysis, Proteobacteria (39.04%), Firmicutes (5.27%), Actinobacteria (2.94%), and Basidiomycota (2.77%) were found to be the dominant phyla in the microbiome of the vaginal samples. At the genus level, Pseudomonas (21.90%) was found to be the most dominant genus, followed by Streptococcus (3.47%), Psychrobacter (1.89%), and Proteus (1.38%). Metastats analysis of the microbial species in the vaginal samples of giant pandas from Wolong Nature Reserve, Dujiangyan and Ningbo Youngor Zoo, and Ya'an Bifengxia Nature Reserve was found to be significantly different (p < 0.05). Age groups, that is, AGE1 (5-10 years old) and AGE2 (11-16 years old), also demonstrated significantly different inter-group microbial species (p < 0.05). For the first time, Chlamydia and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were detected in giant pandas' reproductive tract. GPV3 vaginal sample (2.63%) showed highest Chlamydia content followed by GPV14 (0.91%), and GPV7 (0.62%). GPV5 vaginal sample (7.17%) showed the highest Neisseria gonorrhoeae content, followed by GPV14 (7.02%), and GPV8 (6.50%). Furthermore, we employed eggNOG, CAZy, KEGG, and NCBI databases to investigate the functional significance of giant panda's vaginal microbial community. The outcomes indicated that giant panda's vaginal microbes were involved in biological processes. The data from this study will help in improving the reproductive health of giant pandas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.