ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2021
Analysis of hemodynamic changes from aneurysm inception to large sizes.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- From barrier to guide: Exploiting disease-specific hemodynamics for enhanced nanodrug targeting in cardiovascular diseases.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Perivascular fat attenuation on computed tomography angiography is associated with aneurysm recurrence after endovascular coil embolization.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Geometry, and Hemodynamics of Small and Medium-Sized Intracranial Aneurysms With and Without Blebs in the Chinese Han Population.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2025Article
- Prediction of atherosclerotic changes in cavernous carotid aneurysms based on computational fluid dynamics analysis: a proof-of-concept study.Neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Hemodynamic Characteristic Analysis of Aneurysm Wall Enhancement in Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
While previous studies have identified many risk factors for the progression and rupture of cerebral aneurysms, the changes in aneurysm flow characteristics during its evolution are not fully understood. This work analyzes the changes in the aneurysm hemodynamic environment from its initial development to later stages when the aneurysm has substantially enlarged. A total of 88 aneurysms at four locations were studied with image based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Two synthetic sequences representing the aneurysm geometry at three earlier stages were generated by shrinking the aneurysm sac while keeping the neck fixed or shrinking the neck simultaneously. The flow conditions were then quantitatively compared between these two modes of evolution. As aneurysms enlarged, the inflow rate increased in growing neck sequences, but decreased in fixed neck sequences. The inflow jet became more concentrated in both sequences. The mean aneurysm flow velocity and wall shear stress decreased in both sequences, but they decreased faster in enlarging aneurysms if the neck was fixed. Additionally, the intra-aneurysmal flows became more complex and more unstable, wall shear stress distribution became more oscillatory, and the area under low wall shear stress increased for both sequences. The evolution of flow characteristics of aneurysms with fixed and growing necks are different. The observed trends suggest that fixed neck aneurysms may evolve towards a flow environment characteristic of stable aneurysms faster than aneurysms with growing necks, which could also evolve towards a more disfavorable environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.