Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33205373›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Natalizumab is associated with early improvement of working ability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: WANT observational study results.

Ruggero Capra, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Massimiliano Mirabella, Claudio Gasperini, Cinzia Scandellari, Rocco Totaro, Nicola De Rossi, Silvia Masera, Valentina Zipoli, Francesco Patti and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruggero CapraMultiple Sclerosis Center, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy. ruggero.capra@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4338-3406
Vincenzo Brescia MorraDipartimento di Neuroscienze e Scienze Riproduttive ed Odontostomatologiche, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano MirabellaMultiple Sclerosis Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Claudio GasperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Cinzia ScandellariIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOsI Riabilitazione Sclerosi Multipla, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Rocco TotaroMultiple Sclerosis Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
Nicola De RossiMultiple Sclerosis Center, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy.
Silvia MaseraBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Valentina ZipoliBiogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Francesco PattiDANA Department, "GF Ingrassia", Medical and Surgical Sciences, Advanced Technologies, Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
WANT Investigators
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITBiogen (United States) · USAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITSan Salvatore Hospital · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Biogen Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Work Ability in Natalizumab-Treated MS Patients (WANT) study assessed work ability, quality of life, and cognitive processing speed during natalizumab treatment.

methodsWANT was a 1-year, prospective, multicenter observational study conducted in Italy. Inclusion criteria included relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), natalizumab treatment, full-time worker status, and loss of working hours due to MS as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for MS (WPAI:MS). The primary endpoint was change in WPAI:MS domain scores after 1 year on natalizumab. Secondary endpoints included change in annualized relapse rate (ARR), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) score, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) score.

resultsAt enrollment, the 91 patients had a mean age of 38.3 (standard deviation [SD], 9.0) years and a mean ARR of 1.5 (SD, 0.8). After 1 year, improvements were observed in all WPAI:MS domains, with significant reductions in Absenteeism (-4.2 [SD, 26.0], p = 0.0190) and Work Productivity Loss (-7.2 [SD, 28.6]; p = 0.0456). These changes were accompanied by a low ARR (0.1), and 87.9% of patients were relapse free. Significant improvement was observed in MSIS-29 physical and psychological domains (reductions of 2.8 [SD, 11.6; p = 0.0295] and 6.3 [SD, 15.6; p = 0.0007], respectively) and SDMT score (increase of 2.4 [SD, 7.9; p = 0.0006]). Adverse events were reported in 32 of 104 patients (30.8%).

conclusionsThe reductions in Absenteeism and Work Productivity Loss and the improved physical and psychological functioning reported after 1 year of natalizumab treatment in real-world settings extend our understanding of natalizumab's effects on patient-centric and health economics outcomes.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingChildHumansImmunologic FactorsItalyNatalizumabProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabClinical outcomesCognitive functionMultiple sclerosisQuality of lifeWork productivity

Identifiers

PMID33205373
OpenAlexW3104226692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.