Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33205155›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2021

Understanding Language Abnormalities and Associated Clinical Markers in Psychosis: The Promise of Computational Methods.

Kasia Hitczenko, Vijay A Mittal, Matthew Goldrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural neuroimaging correlates of semantic incoherence in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Trajectories through semantic spaces in schizophrenia and the relationship to ripple bursts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Neural evidence of switch processes during semantic and phonetic foraging in human memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kasia HitczenkoDepartment of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Matthew GoldrickDepartment of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

Funding

Using Speech Acoustics to Reveal Motor Disruptions in PsychosisR21MH119677 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDRICK, MATTHEW A, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2019 to 2020
$424k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The language and speech of individuals with psychosis reflect their impairments in cognition and motor processes. These language disturbances can be used to identify individuals with and at high risk for psychosis, as well as help track and predict symptom progression, allowing for early intervention and improved outcomes. However, current methods of language assessment-manual annotations and/or clinical rating scales-are time intensive, expensive, subject to bias, and difficult to administer on a wide scale, limiting this area from reaching its full potential. Computational methods that can automatically perform linguistic analysis have started to be applied to this problem and could drastically improve our ability to use linguistic information clinically. In this article, we first review how these automated, computational methods work and how they have been applied to the field of psychosis. We show that across domains, these methods have captured differences between individuals with psychosis and healthy controls and can classify individuals with high accuracies, demonstrating the promise of these methods. We then consider the obstacles that need to be overcome before these methods can play a significant role in the clinical process and provide suggestions for how the field should address them. In particular, while much of the work thus far has focused on demonstrating the successes of these methods, we argue that a better understanding of when and why these models fail will be crucial toward ensuring these methods reach their potential in the field of psychosis.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsAdultBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionHumansLanguage DisordersPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaThinkingBiomarkersautomated linguistic analysiscomputational linguisticslanguage productionspeechthought disorder

Identifiers

PMID33205155
PMCPMC8480175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.