Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33205108›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2020

BIAFLOWS: A Collaborative Framework to Reproducibly Deploy and Benchmark Bioimage Analysis Workflows.

Ulysse Rubens, Romain Mormont, Lassi Paavolainen, Volker Bäcker, Benjamin Pavie, Leandro A Scholz, Gino Michiels, Martin Maška, Devrim Ünay, Graeme Ball and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ulysse RubensMontefiore Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Romain MormontMontefiore Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Lassi PaavolainenFIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Volker BäckerMRI, BioCampus Montpellier, Montpellier 34094, France.
Benjamin PavieVIB BioImaging Core, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Leandro A ScholzUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil.
Gino MichielsHEPL, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Martin MaškaMasaryk University, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic.
Devrim ÜnayFaculty of Engineering İzmir, Demokrasi University, 35330 Balçova, Turkey.
Graeme BallDundee Imaging Facility, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Renaud HoyouxCytomine SCRL FS, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Rémy VandaeleMontefiore Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Ofra GolaniLife Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Stefan G StanciuPolitehnica Bucarest, Bucarest 060042, Romania.
Natasa SladojeUppsala University, P.O. Box 256, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
Perrine Paul-GilloteauxStructure Fédérative de Recherche François Bonamy, Université de Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, Nantes Cedex 1 13522 44035, France.
Raphaël MaréeMontefiore Institute, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Sébastien TosiInstitute for Research in Biomedicine, IRB Barcelona, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, BIST, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image analysis is key to extracting quantitative information from scientific microscopy images, but the methods involved are now often so refined that they can no longer be unambiguously described by written protocols. We introduce BIAFLOWS, an open-source web tool enabling to reproducibly deploy and benchmark bioimage analysis workflows coming from any software ecosystem. A curated instance of BIAFLOWS populated with 34 image analysis workflows and 15 microscopy image datasets recapitulating common bioimage analysis problems is available online. The workflows can be launched and assessed remotely by comparing their performance visually and according to standard benchmark metrics. We illustrated these features by comparing seven nuclei segmentation workflows, including deep-learning methods. BIAFLOWS enables to benchmark and share bioimage analysis workflows, hence safeguarding research results and promoting high-quality standards in image analysis. The platform is thoroughly documented and ready to gather annotated microscopy datasets and workflows contributed by the bioimaging community.

Indexed as

benchmarkingbioimagingcommunitydeep learningdeploymentimage analysisreproducibilitysoftwareweb application

Identifiers

PMID33205108
PMCPMC7660398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.