ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2020
Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, are low-risk patients really at low risk? A case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetically determined myocardial disease that constitutes the main cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes. Apical HCM (ApHCM) represents a complex subset of patients, whose risk of SCD seems not negligible. Most applied scores likely underestimate the risk of heart events in this subset of patients. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of a 55-year-old man who was admitted in the emergency department after an episode of aborted sudden death due to ventricular fibrillation. The electrocardiogram made at admission was noted for atrial fibrillation and a new-onset left bundle branch block. Emergency coronary angiography was normal. The electrocardiogram was repeated and showed symmetrical and profound inversion of T waves in the lateral leads. Transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance revealed left ventricular apical hypertrophy suggestive of apical variant of HCM. A cardiac defibrillator was implanted for secondary prevention of SCD. After 6 months of follow-up no further rhythmic events were noted. DISCUSSION: Although low, the risk of SCD of ApHCM patients is not negligible. This case illustrates the need for searching of new predictors of rhythmic risk in patients with ApHCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.