ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2020
Upfront triple oral combination therapy including selexipag in a high-risk patient with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intratracheally Administered Peptide-Modified Lipid Admixture Containing Fasudil and/or DETA NONOate Ameliorates Various Pathologies of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transitioning intravenous epoprostenol to oral selexipag in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a case report.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelexipag is an oral selective prostacyclin IP receptor agonist approved in patients with low- and intermediate-risk pulmonary hypertension (PH); evidence in patients at high risk is lacking. CASE SUMMARY: A 42-year-old woman with worsening dyspnoea (World Health Organization functional class III-IV) and suspected PH at echocardiographic examination was evaluated in our Pulmonary Hypertension Centre. Right heart catheterization showed pre-capillary PH with reduced cardiac index and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. High-resolution computed tomography excluded parenchymal lung disease and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scan was negative for mismatched perfusion defects so the conclusive diagnosis was high-risk idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The patient refused an initial combination therapy including a parenteral prostacyclin analogue (PCA) in accordance with the ESC/ERS guidelines, so an off-label triple oral combination therapy including a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, an endothelin receptor antagonist, and selexipag was started. At 3- and 6-month follow-up we found a clinical and haemodynamic improvement, so the patient was reclassified as low risk. Her clinical condition is currently stable. DISCUSSION: Despite the benefit of parenteral PCAs in high-risk PAH, low adherence to treatment may be explained by adverse side effects related to the intravenous route of administration. Given the potential effect seen in our patient, upfront triple oral combination therapy in PAH high-risk patients should be further evaluated in a controlled clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.