Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204836›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2020

Opioid Use Disorder and Assessment of Patient Interactions Among Family Medicine Residents, Medical Students, and Physician Assistant Students.

John G Spangler, Catherine N Shull, Carol A Hildebrandt, Keli Beck Jones, Andrew L Brewer, Mark P Knudson, Gail S Marion, Julienne K Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John G SpanglerProfessor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family & Community Medicine.
Catherine N ShullAssistant Professor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Departments of PA Studies, Family & Community Medicine.
Carol A HildebrandtAcademic Curriculum Coordinator, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of PA Studies.
Keli Beck JonesAssistant Professor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family & Community Medicine.
Andrew L BrewerInstructional Technologist, Northwest Area Health Education Center.
Mark P KnudsonProfessor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family & Community Medicine.
Gail S MarionProfessor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family & Community Medicine.
Julienne K KirkProfessor, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family & Community Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In light of the opioid overdose epidemic in the US and the necessity of developing training to conduct difficult conversations around opioid dependence, three case-based videos were created to demonstrate providers using motivational interviewing (MI) with patients who have opioid use disorder (OUD). These vignettes displayed a primary care provider interacting with a patient seeking opioids. Methods: Learners-including third-year medical and physician assistant (PA) students, and family medicine residents-viewed three videos set in a family medicine clinic and assessed clinician use of MI when interacting with patients with OUD. The patients were at different levels of acknowledging their need to change their opioid use behaviors and/or pursue treatment. Learners rated each video with an MI rating scale, and a facilitator debriefed strengths, weaknesses, and omissions regarding MI. Results: Medical and PA students, and resident family physicians provided 572 ratings. Analysis of variance of mean percent incorrect was lower in residents than in all groups combined, but failed to reach statistical significance (47% + 12.0 vs 53% + 15.0, Discussion: These case-based videos with MI ratings afforded students and residents the opportunity to assess clinician use of MI techniques with patients with OUD. The MI rating scale had clinical significance (residents scored +5 points and had more training) despite lacking statistical significance. These scenarios allowed learners to recognize how to use MI when having a difficult conversation with patients who misuse opioids. We envision individual use or use for group discussion.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyOpioid-Related DisordersPhysician AssistantsStudents, MedicalCurriculumFamily PracticeHumansAddictionCase-Based LearningClinical Teaching/Bedside TeachingCurriculumDrug DependenceMedical LearnersMedication Assisted TreatmentNurse/Nurse PractitionerOpioidsOpioid Use DisorderPharmacistPhysicianPhysician AssistantProblem-Based LearningPsychologistSelf-AssessmentSubstance Abuse/AddictionVideo Review

Identifiers

PMID33204836
PMCPMC7666834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.