Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204812›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

Theoretical frameworks and approaches used within the Reserve, Resilience and Protective Factors professional interest area of the Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment.

David Bartrés-Faz, Eider Arenaza-Urquijo, Michael Ewers, Sylvie Belleville, Gaël Chételat, Nicolai Franzmeier, Julie Gonneaud, José María González de Echevarri, Ozioma Okonkwo, Stephanie Schultz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sex and gender differences in cognitive resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Tau-neurodegeneration mismatch reveals vulnerability and resilience to comorbidities in Alzheimer's continuum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A profile of brain reserve in adults at genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David Bartrés-FazDepartment of Medicine Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Institute of Neurosciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Eider Arenaza-UrquijoBarcelonabeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain.
Michael EwersInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Sylvie BellevilleResearch Center Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal and Department of Psychology Université de Montréal Montreal Canada.
Gaël ChételatUNICAEN INSERM U1237 PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders," Normandie University Paris France.
Nicolai FranzmeierInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany.
Julie GonneaudDouglas Mental Health Institute McGill University Montreal Canada.
José María González de EchevarriBarcelonabeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain.
Ozioma OkonkwoWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Stephanie SchultzWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison Wisconsin USA.
Michael ValenzuelaSchool of Psychiatry, Medicine University of New South Wales Sydney Australia.
Yaakov SternCognitive Neuroscience Division Department of Neurology Columbia University New York New York USA.
Prashanthi VemuriDepartment of Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.

Funding

Satellite Diagnostic and Treatment Clinic CoreP50AG008702 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 1989 to 2019
$46.3M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Barbara Brigitta Bendlin · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Miguel Arce · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Imaging of Cognition, Learning and Memory in AgingR01AG026158 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI STERN, YAAKOV · 2004 to 2021
$10.9M
Investigating Resistance and Resilience Mechanisms in Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG056366 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PRASHANTHI VEMURI · 2017 to 2026
$7.0M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P50 AG008702NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026158NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReserve, resilience, maintenance, and related concepts are intensely debated in aging and Alzheimer's disease research.

methodsThrough a short survey, we gathered information about theoretical concepts and methodologies used among research groups of the Reserve, Resilience, and Protective Factors Professional Interest Area of the Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment.

resultsOverall 53 research groups responded. Reserve and resilience were the most frequently used conceptual frameworks. Education, occupation, leisure, and social activities were frequently used as measures, as were longitudinal designs. Neuropsychological assessments were almost universal, and usage of imaging biomarkers was frequent. In observational-epidemiological study designs, resilience and reserve together (vs reserve alone) were commonly used as theoretical frameworks. DISCUSSION: We provide a first description of concepts and methodologies used among reserve and resilience researchers. This will inform initiatives aiming to reach consensus on terminology and applications to establish common definitions.

Indexed as

brain reservecognitive reservemaintenancemethodologiesoutcome measuresresiliencetechniques

Identifiers

PMID33204812
PMCPMC7656169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.