Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204756›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2020

Pooling of Upper Respiratory Specimens Using a SARS-CoV-2 Real-time RT-PCR Assay Authorized for Emergency Use in Low-Prevalence Populations for High-Throughput Testing.

Gwynngelle A Borillo, Ron M Kagan, Russell E Baumann, Boris M Fainstein, Lamela Umaru, Hai-Rong Li, Harvey W Kaufman, Nigel J Clarke, Elizabeth M Marlowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pooled Testing Strategies for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis: A comprehensive review.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gwynngelle A BorilloQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Ron M KaganQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Russell E BaumannQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Boris M FainsteinQuest Diagnostics Information Ventures, New York, New York, USA.
Lamela UmaruQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Hai-Rong LiQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Harvey W KaufmanQuest Diagnostics Information Ventures, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.
Nigel J ClarkeQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Elizabeth M MarloweQuest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNucleic acid amplification testing is a critical tool for addressing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Specimen pooling can increase throughput and conserve testing resources but requires validation to ensure that reduced sensitivity does not increase the false-negative rate. We evaluated the performance of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use for pooled testing of upper respiratory specimens.

methodsPositive specimens were selected from 3 prevalence groups, 1%-3%, >3%-6%, and >6%-10%. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was assessed by pooling single-positive specimens with 3 negative specimens; performance was assessed using Passing-Bablok regression. Additionally, we assessed the distributions of RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for 3091 positive specimens.

resultsPPA was 100% for the 101 pooled specimens. There was a linear relationship between Ct values for pooled and single-tested specimens (

conclusionsPooled and individual testing of specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated 100% agreement, which demonstrates the viability of pooled specimens for SARS-COV-2 testing using a dual-target RT-PCR system. Pooled specimen testing can help increase testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2 with a low risk of false-negative results.

Indexed as

pooled testingpositive percent agreementRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33204756
PMCPMC7543567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.