Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204579›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2020

MEG Sensor Selection for Neural Speech Decoding.

Debadatta Dash, Alan Wisler, Paul Ferrari, Elizabeth Moody Davenport, Joseph Maldjian, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Debadatta DashDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0543-0304
Alan WislerDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Paul FerrariMEG Laboratory, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX 78723, USA.
Elizabeth Moody DavenportDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Joseph MaldjianDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-217X

Funding

Wearable silent speech technology to enhance impaired oral communicationR01DC016621 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WANG, JUN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Real-Time Articulation-to-Speech Mapping for Enhancing Impaired Oral CommunicationR03DC013990 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI WANG, JUN · 2015 to 2017
$459k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016621NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct decoding of speech from the brain is a faster alternative to current electroencephalography (EEG) speller-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in providing communication assistance to locked-in patients. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has recently shown great potential as a non-invasive neuroimaging modality for neural speech decoding, owing in part to its spatial selectivity over other high-temporal resolution devices. Standard MEG systems have a large number of cryogenically cooled channels/sensors (200 - 300) encapsulated within a fixed liquid helium dewar, precluding their use as wearable BCI devices. Fortunately, recently developed optically pumped magnetometers (OPM) do not require cryogens, and have the potential to be wearable and movable making them more suitable for BCI applications. This design is also modular allowing for customized montages to include only the sensors necessary for a particular task. As the number of sensors bears a heavy influence on the cost, size, and weight of MEG systems, minimizing the number of sensors is critical for designing practical MEG-based BCIs in the future. In this study, we sought to identify an optimal set of MEG channels to decode imagined and spoken phrases from the MEG signals. Using a forward selection algorithm with a support vector machine classifier we found that nine optimally located MEG gradiometers provided higher decoding accuracy compared to using all channels. Additionally, the forward selection algorithm achieved similar performance to dimensionality reduction using a stacked-sparse-autoencoder. Analysis of spatial dynamics of speech decoding suggested that both left and right hemisphere sensors contribute to speech decoding. Sensors approximately located near Broca's area were found to be commonly contributing among the higher-ranked sensors across all subjects.

Indexed as

Autoencoderbrain-computer interfaceforward selection algorithmmagnetoencephalographyneural speech decodingOPMSVM

Identifiers

PMID33204579
PMCPMC7668411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.