ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2020
MEG Sensor Selection for Neural Speech Decoding.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal sensor set for MEG-based spontaneous and intended speech decoding toward practical communication.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Signal acquisition of brain-computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Coherence-based channel selection and Riemannian geometry features for magnetoencephalography decoding.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Decoding Brain Signals from Rapid-Event EEG for Visual Analysis Using Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Decoding N400m Evoked Component: A Tutorial on Multivariate Pattern Analysis for OP-MEG Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Decoding kinematic information from beta-band motor rhythms of speech motor cortex: a methodological/analytic approach using concurrent speech movement tracking and magnetoencephalography.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Bimodal electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset for inner-speech recognition.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Rethinking the Methods and Algorithms for Inner Speech Decoding and Making Them Reproducible.NeuroSci · 2022Article
- Imagined speech can be decoded from low- and cross-frequency intracranial EEG features.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Slow Firing Single Units Are Essential for Optimal Decoding of Silent Speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Decoding Covert Speech From EEG-A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct decoding of speech from the brain is a faster alternative to current electroencephalography (EEG) speller-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in providing communication assistance to locked-in patients. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has recently shown great potential as a non-invasive neuroimaging modality for neural speech decoding, owing in part to its spatial selectivity over other high-temporal resolution devices. Standard MEG systems have a large number of cryogenically cooled channels/sensors (200 - 300) encapsulated within a fixed liquid helium dewar, precluding their use as wearable BCI devices. Fortunately, recently developed optically pumped magnetometers (OPM) do not require cryogens, and have the potential to be wearable and movable making them more suitable for BCI applications. This design is also modular allowing for customized montages to include only the sensors necessary for a particular task. As the number of sensors bears a heavy influence on the cost, size, and weight of MEG systems, minimizing the number of sensors is critical for designing practical MEG-based BCIs in the future. In this study, we sought to identify an optimal set of MEG channels to decode imagined and spoken phrases from the MEG signals. Using a forward selection algorithm with a support vector machine classifier we found that nine optimally located MEG gradiometers provided higher decoding accuracy compared to using all channels. Additionally, the forward selection algorithm achieved similar performance to dimensionality reduction using a stacked-sparse-autoencoder. Analysis of spatial dynamics of speech decoding suggested that both left and right hemisphere sensors contribute to speech decoding. Sensors approximately located near Broca's area were found to be commonly contributing among the higher-ranked sensors across all subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.