Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204499›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Frontiers in non-union research.

Enrique Gómez-Barrena, Norma G Padilla-Eguiluz, Philippe Rosset

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-term radiological and clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of non-union: a ten-year follow-up study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of non-unions of the malleolar fractures- Current Evidence.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024
    Article
  9. Gait Analysis to Monitor Fracture Healing of the Lower Leg.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique Gómez-BarrenaServicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital La Paz-IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Norma G Padilla-EguiluzServicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital La Paz-IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Philippe RossetService de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologie, CHU Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multifactorial aetiology defines non-unions, with a biological and a mechanical distortion of the timeline of bone healing.Research on new advances to increase osteogenesis and promote non-union healing is strongly directed towards new forms of cell products.Basic science and research on non-union treatments is needed to compile preclinical data on new treatments.Bone marrow concentration and expanded mesenchymal stromal cells still require extensive clinical research to confirm efficacy in non-union treatment.Solid preclinical studies, precise cell product definition and preparation, and appropriate ethical and regulatory approvals are needed to assess new advanced therapy medicinal products. Cite this article:

Indexed as

ATMPs (advanced therapy medicinal products)bone healingcell therapyMSCs (mesenchymal stromal cells) and biomaterialsnon-union

Identifiers

PMID33204499
PMCPMC7608578
OpenAlexW3097315546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.