Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33204438›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Actions do not speak louder than words in an interactive false belief task.

Lisa Wenzel, Sebastian Dörrenberg, Marina Proft, Ulf Liszkowski, Hannes Rakoczy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pragmatics for infants: commentary on WenzelRoyal Society open science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa WenzelDevelopmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1761-0588
Sebastian DörrenbergDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3489-5001
Marina ProftDevelopmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Ulf LiszkowskiDevelopmental Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Hannes RakoczyDevelopmental Psychology, University of Göttingen, Waldweg 26, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, it had been assumed that meta-representational Theory of Mind (ToM) emerges around the age of 4 when children come to master standard false belief (FB) tasks. More recent research with various implicit measures, though, has documented much earlier competence and thus challenged the traditional picture. In interactive FB tasks, for instance, infants have been shown to track an interlocutor's false or true belief when interpreting her ambiguous communicative acts (Southgate

Indexed as

cognitive developmentfalse beliefimplicit Theory of MindpragmaticsreplicationSefo

Identifiers

PMID33204438
PMCPMC7657934
OpenAlexW3092668223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.